法律论证研究的问题立场

The Position of Problem of the Study on Legal Argumentation

法律论证理论在中国的学术研究中已受到相当的重视。但理论本身的内涵有待澄清,该理论在中国司法环境中的功用遭遇质疑,需释明其问题立场。澄清概念的内涵和概念意义,是概念承载的理论得到更好应用的前提,对法律论证与法律推理这一对概念的异同与使用进行梳理,阐明对法律论证与法律推理两个概念作基本区分的意义。以语境论为讨论的方法路径,将对法律论证理论之功的追问与司法语境相关联;以此为基础,立足于中国的司法生态,证成中国司法语境法律论证的问题场域应着力于普通案件,而非法律适用上的疑难案件。

Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation theory has attracted much attention in Chinese academic research.However,with its connotation in lack of further explanation,the function of this theory in Chinese judicial system is in doubt,so that the further clarification is needed in the position of problem in this theory.Clarifying the connotation and meaning of a concept is the premise of better applying the theory containing the concept,thus to understand the similarities and the differentiation between legal argumentation and legal reasoning and the function of them and to explain the reason to tell the basic differences between these two concepts.With contextualism as the methodology for the discussion on the function of Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation linking with judicial context,on the basis of which,the position problem of Legal Argumentation in Chinese judicial context is proved to focus on general cases instead of dealing with hard cases in the application of law