期刊文献+

20世纪初的三大论争与马克思主义中国化的启程 被引量:1

The Three Disputes in the the Early 20th Century and the Beginning of Sinicization of Marxism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从马克思主义中国化的视角解读20世纪初中国思想界三大论争会使我们对论争的意义有一全新认识。"问题与主义"之争明确了马克思主义中国化的基本要义乃是以马克思主义理论去解决中国的实际问题;社会主义之争明确了马克思主义中国化是解决中国问题的必由之路;无政府主义之争则明确了建立中国共产党是实现马克思主义中国化的迫切任务。三大论争构成了马克思主义中国化启程的逻辑链条,为马克思主义中国化的逐步展开作了思想上和理论上的铺垫。 From the perspective of sinicization of marxism,the three major disputes in the Chinese ideological circles at the beginning of the20th century w ill give us a new understanding of the significance of the debate.The dispute between“Problems and Doctrines”clarifies that the basic essence of sinicization of marxism is to solve the practical problems of China with marxism;the dispute on socialism clarifies that sinicization of marxism is the only way to solve the problems of China;and the dispute on anarchism has made it clear that the establishment of the Communist Party of China is an urgent task for the realization of the sinicization of marxism.The three major disputes constitute the logical chain of the beginning of sinicization of marxism,which has laid the foundation of thought and theory for the gradual expansion of the sinicization of marxism.
作者 李后梅 Li Houmei(School of Marxism, Anhui University of Science and Technology,Huainan, Anhui 232001,China)
出处 《安徽理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2018年第1期6-11,共6页 Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology:Social Science
关键词 马克思主义中国化 “问题与主义”之争 社会主义之争 无政府主义之争 Sinicization of marxism The dispute between “Problems and Doctrines” The dispute on socialism The dispute on Anarchism
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献7

  • 1[2](美)C·M·特.分析时代[M].北京:商务印书馆,1981.
  • 2[4]李泽厚.中国现代思想史论[M].合肥:安徽文艺出版社,1991.
  • 3[5]李大钊文集[M].北京:人民出版社,1959.
  • 4何干之主编.中国现代革命史讲义[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1954,23.
  • 5胡华主编.中国革命史讲义[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1959,33,33,34.
  • 6中国共产党历史讲义(初稿)[M].北京:中国人民大出版社,1961.
  • 7中国共产党历史1921-1949[M].北京:中共党史出版社,2002.

共引文献27

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部