《城堡》“反懂”吗?

Is The Castle an “Anti-understanding” Text?

无论参照卡夫卡对其写作事业与作品的一般性理解,还是证之于《城堡》学术史,对《城堡》的"反懂欣赏"都是令人困惑的。"反懂"理论在逻辑上难以成立,其厚今薄古的价值取向更容易导致对文学作品所依托古典资源的盲视。事实上,既不存在一个适合于"反懂"的恰当对象,也不存在"反懂"所反对的那种"唯一正确"的欣赏。《城堡》本身并不"反懂",对《城堡》的欣赏需要了解《城堡》所涉及的古典传统,也需要一定的批评想象力。

No matter according to Kafka’s general understanding of his own with the history of criticisms about The Castle,the“anti-understanding appreciation”of this workis untenable in many details.“Anti-understanding”theory is not persuasive in orientation of u preferring modem to the ancient”also leads to blindness to the classic resourceswhich the literary works may refer to.In fact,there is not a proper object which is appropriate foranti-understanding,nor the alleged“only right”appreciation opposed by uanti-understanding”.The C a t itself does not“anti-understand”,and a good way of appreciation of it needs someknowledge of the related classic traditions,as well as a certain kind of critical imagination to provokethem.