期刊文献+

专业化与企业风险——以寿险业为例 被引量:2

Specialization and Firm Risk:Evidence from Life Insurance Industry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 考虑到不同企业所在地区的资源禀赋等环境因素存在差异,本文以一家企业的产品结构与该企业所在市场的产品结构的差异度来度量该企业的专业化,称之为"相对专业化"。本文以2006—2016年中国地级(及以上)地区的寿险机构的分产品部门的数据为样本。考虑到专业化常常是内生变量,本文利用数据的层级结构,为专业化构造了合适的工具变量。通过回归分析发现:寿险公司的专业化程度提高1个标准差,赔付风险将降低17.11~23.77个百分点,退保风险将降低0.70~1.64个百分点;专业化对赔付风险和退保风险的负向影响在金融危机期间强于其他期间,在市场经济越发达的地区作用越强。 Given the difference in resource endowment and other environmental factors where a firm operates,this paper measures the specialization of a firm as the"divergence"of the product structure between the firm and the market the firm belongs to,which is called"relative specialization".This paper uses the data of sub-sectors of life insurance institutions in prefecture-level regions as the sample.Considering that the specialization is often an endogenous variable,we construct a proper instrumental variable using our hierarchical data.The results show that:when life insurers’specialization increases by one standard deviation,the loss risk and surrender risk will decrease by 17.11-23.77percentage points and0.70-1.64percentage points,respectively;the negative effects of specialization on loss risk and surrender risk are stronger for financial crisis period than other periods,and are stronger for the regions of more developed market economy.
出处 《当代经济科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第2期38-47,共10页 Modern Economic Science
关键词 专业化 相对测度 风险 内生性 保险 Specialization Relative measure Risk Endogeneity Insurance
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献27

  • 1雷良海,杜小娟.上市公司多角化经营程度与经营绩效关系的实证研究[J].上海理工大学学报,2003,25(4):341-345. 被引量:16
  • 2徐康宁,韩剑.中国钢铁产业的集中度、布局与结构优化研究——兼评2005年钢铁产业发展政策[J].中国工业经济,2006(2):37-44. 被引量:124
  • 3Capon.,N. Corporate Diversity and Economic Performance: The Impact of Market Specialization [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1988, (9).
  • 4Chandler, A. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of American Industrial Enterprise [M]. MIT Press, 1962.
  • 5Gort, Michael. Diversification and Integration in American Industry[M]. Princeton University Press,1962.
  • 6Rumelt R.P. Strategy, Structure, Economics Perforation[M]. Harvard University Press,1974.
  • 7Fiegenbaum A, Thomas H. Strategic groups and perform- ance : The US insurance industry, 1970 - 84 [ J ]. Strate- gic Management Journal, 1990, 11:197-215.
  • 8Hoyt R E, Trieschmann J S. Risk/return relationships for life - health, property - liability, and diversified insurers [ J]. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 1991, 58:322 - 330.
  • 9Berger A N, Cummins J D, Weiss M A, Zi H. Conglom- eration versus strategic focus: Evidence from the insur- ance industry [ J ]. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2000, 9 : 323 - 362.
  • 10Meador J W, Ryan Jr H E, Schellhorn C D. Product fo- cus versus diversification: Estimates of X - efficiency for the US life insurance industry[ A]. Harker P T, Zenios S A. Performance of financial institutions : Efficiency, in- novation, regulation [ M ]. New York: Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2000, 175 - 198.

共引文献25

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部