期刊文献+

城市开放政府数据平台服务绩效评估体系构建及应用 被引量:25

Construction and Application of Service Performance Evaluation System on City Government Open Data Portals
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章在逻辑框架法和文献回顾的基础上,构建了包含3个一级指标、7个二级指标和19个三级指标的城市开放政府数据平台服务绩效评估体系;借助层次分析法辅助软件yaahp确定各项指标的权重,依据该体系并使用模糊综合评价法对广东省8个城市的开放政府数据平台的服务绩效展开评估,并与北京市和上海市的评估结果进行比较。研究发现:10个城市的综合得分呈现出明显的三个梯队,第一梯队是北京和上海,第二梯队是广州、深圳和东莞,第三梯队是揭阳、肇庆、湛江、梅州和阳江。 Based on the logical framework approach and literature review,an evaluation system on service performance of city government open data portals was constructed.The system consisted of3first-level,7second-level and19third-level indicators.The weightings of these indicators were identified by using the yaaho software,an analytic hierarchy process software.Then the evaluation system was applied to assess8city government open data portals in Guangdong province using the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method.The results were compared with Beijing and Shanghai municipalities’government portals.The comparison showed that the scores of these ten cities could be readily divided into three tiers.Beijing and Shanghai belonged to the first tier.Guangzhou,Shenzhen and Dongguan were in the second.The third tier covered Jieyang,Zhaoqing,Zhanjiang,Meizhou and Yangjiang.
作者 武琳 伍诗瑜 WU Lin;WU Shiyu
出处 《图书馆论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第2期59-65,共7页 Library Tribune
关键词 开放政府 数据平台 绩效评估 逻辑框架法 层次分析法 yaahp软件 city government data portal performance evaluation logical framework approach analytic hierarchy process yaahp
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献56

  • 1何宏,刘勇,郭柏栋,邵军师.基于模糊综合评价法的经济开发区土地评价研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(S1):158-161. 被引量:15
  • 2卫军朝,蔚海燕.上海推进政府开放数据建设的路径及对策[J].科学发展,2014(11):80-88. 被引量:14
  • 3向上.信息系统中的数据质量评价方法研究[J].现代情报,2007,27(3):67-68. 被引量:16
  • 4吴明隆.结构方程模型一AMOS的操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009.
  • 5Davies T,Sharif R,Alonso J.Open Data Barometer-Global Report Second Edition[R].World Wide Web Foundation,2015.
  • 6Open Knowledge.Open Data Index[EB/OL].[2015-07-01].http://index.okfn.org.
  • 7The Gov Lab.Open Data 500[EB/OL].[2015-07-01].http://www.opendata500.com/.
  • 8Caplan R,Davies T,Wadud A,et al.Towards a Common Methods for Assessing Open Data:Work Shop Report&Draft Framework[R].World Wide Web Foundation,2014.
  • 9Chui Michael. What executives should know about open data [J].McKinsey Quarterly, 2014,4(1): 102-105.
  • 10Luis Felipe Luna-Reyes, John C Bertot, Sehl Mellouli. Open government, open data and digital government [J].Government Information Quarterly, 2014,31(1):4-5.

共引文献300

同被引文献325

引证文献25

二级引证文献237

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部