摘要
《公司法解释三》第七条第二款对以违法犯罪所得出资取得的股权直接采取公权力强制除权的规定,忽视了公司法对自由、安全、公平价值的重视,使得股权的性质趋于单一化,难以缓和私法与公法的法益冲突。针对上述问题,应当基于公司人合性的特征以及交易安全的理论角度寻求解决路径。具体而言,可以从私权保护的视角出发,对该规则加以进一步的解释与说明,在股东被强制除权前,寻求其退缴违法犯罪所得及其收益后保留股权的机制,以合理衡平各方利益。
In the Provisions III of Company Law of the People's Republic of China,it is stipulated that the equity ownership,which comes from the investment that the shareholder have in the company by illegal income,should be deprived by national enforcement power.The act goes against the legislative value of corporate law,simplifies the nature of shareholder's right and the interests of all parties.Hence,for the protection of private rights,the regulation above should not only be given further legal interpretations and explanations,but also be complemented by the mechanism of reservation of shareholder's right after the illegal income has been returned,in order to achieve the purpose of law that balance the respective interests.
作者
吴昊
Wu Hao(School of Law,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)
出处
《山西农业大学学报(社会科学版)》
2018年第3期48-54,共7页
Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University:Social Science Edition
基金
中国司法部国家法治与法学理论研究课题(09SFB3021)
关键词
股东权
出资
法益冲突
强制除权
公权力限制
Shareholder′s right
Investment
Conflict of legal interests
Compulsive deprivation of right
Limit of public power