作为义务中“支配领域性说”于我国的反思与修正

The Consideration and Amendment of the Duty of “Domination Theory” in China

"支配领域性"作为"排他性支配理论"的一种情形,是本体论之下注重事实基础的产物。"支配领域性"的合理性可以从功利主义或者社会连带义务进行考察。但是,功利主义主张的利益衡量框架之下,利益衡量理论可能得出个人自由高于待保护脆弱法益的结论,难以推导出作为义务的存在;社会连带义务动摇了"排他性支配理论"的事实性根基,回到了规范领域,并且在我国难以找到理论依据。"支配领域性"的修正需要在本体论的框架下进行,要求必须存在事实上的承担行为。在评价事实承担行为的时候需要考虑特定行业、领域和行为的风险,以此决定在多大程度上溯及确定事实承担行为。

“Domination theory”is the situation of‘exclusionary theory’,which is the product of the ontology focused on the facts.The base of“domination theory”can be utilitarian or social joint obligation.However,under the interest frame of utilitarian,one can get the conclusion that freedomis higher than the broken interests,which cannot lead to the conclusion of“domination theory”.Social joint obligation changes the base of“exclusionary theory”,returns to the norm theory and cannot find theoretical foundation in China.The amendment of“exclusionary theory”should be based on the frame of ontology with facts of obligation.In judgement,the specific industry and the risk should be considered to make correct deci sions on the facts.