期刊文献+

腹腔镜下阑尾切除时残端单纯套扎与缝合包埋的对比研究 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 急性阑尾炎是临床上最常见的急腹症之一,腹腔镜下阑尾切除术(laparoscopic appendectomy,LA)相比开腹阑尾切除术(open appendectomy,OA)具有创伤小、恢复快、术中探查范围广、术后并发症少等诸多优点[1,2]。但目前对于LA阑尾残端的处理方式仍无具体的规范,存有一定争议[3,4]。本次研究总结近3年来的LA,对单纯套扎及8字缝合包埋阑尾残端的两种处理方式。现报道如下。
出处 《全科医学临床与教育》 2018年第2期203-204,共2页 Clinical Education of General Practice
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献33

  • 1王育和,刘家峰,徐大华,李非,孙家邦.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(12):1184-1185. 被引量:78
  • 2Serum K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy, 1983,15 (2) :59 - 64.
  • 3吴在德,吴肇汉,主编.外科学.第7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2012.467-472.
  • 4Wei HB, Huang JL, Zheng ZH, et al. Laparoseopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Surg Endose, 2009,24 ( 2 ) : 266 - 269.
  • 5Kazemier G, Hofint K, Saad S, et al. Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling. Surg Endosc ,2006,20 (9) : 1473 - 76.
  • 6Schick KS, Huttl TP, Fertmann JM, et al. A critical analysis of laparoscopic appendectomy : how experience with 1,400 appendectomies allowed innovative treatment to become standard in a university hospital. World J Surg,2008,32 ( 7 ) : 1406 - 1413.
  • 7Street D, Bodai BI, Owens LJ, et al. Simple ligation vs stump in version in appendectomy. Arch Surg, 1998,123 (4) :689 - 690.
  • 8McGory ML,Zingmond DS,Tillou A. Negative appendectomy in pregnant women is associated with a substantial risk of fetal loss[J].Journal of the American College of Surgeons,2007,(04):534-540.
  • 9Kim SY,Hong SG,Roh HR. Learning curve for a laparoscopic appendectomy by a surgical trainee[J].J Korean Soc Coloproctol,2010,(05):324-328.
  • 10Masoomi H,Mills S,Dolich MO. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults:data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS),2006-2008[J].Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery,2011,(12):2226-2231.

共引文献173

同被引文献35

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部