《物权法》第24条对航空器所有权的影响

Effects on Article 24 of Property Law to Aircraft Ownership

中国航空器所有权目前的相关规定还不完善,需要借鉴物权法相关规定来对航空器所有权的规定加以细化和补充。明确建造中的航空器所有权的性质是一般动产;交付说和登记只能产生对抗效力更具有合理性;对第三人范围应加以限制和适用善意取得制度;其他相关问题的完善包括改变航空器所有权变动形式的表述和扩充中国民用航空器物权登记事项的受理范围等。目的是厘清弄物权法和民用航空法中关于航空器所有权规定的关系,比较出其相同之处和不同之处,从而得出两个法律中对于航空器所有权的规定还存在的不足之处,使得法律中有关于航空器所有权的规定更加完善,在法律上全面保护航空器所有权的变动,推动中国的航空事业发展和法制建设。

The relevant provisions of the current aircraft ownership are not perfect,so it is necessary to draw on relevant provisions of the Property Law for refinement and supplement.The article clarifies the nature of the aircraft ownership under construction which is generally movable property.The articles holds the view that delivery and registration can only produce opposing effect.The article suggests the range of the third person be limited and innocent acquisition system be applied.Other related issues include changing the form of aircraft ownership and expanding the acceptance scope of property rights registration of Chinese civil aircraft.The aim of the article is to clarify the relationship between the Property Law and aircraft ownership,and compare the similarities and differences to find out drawback of the aircraft ownership,thus making laws on aircraft ownership more perfect.In order to promote the development of China’s aviation industry and the legal system,this article makes suggestions on aircraft ownership in law.