摘要
论文主要围绕国外学者Kathleen Wider和Adrian Mirvish对萨特"他人"理论的研究展开论述。前者对萨特的"他人"理论持有批判的态度,对其"他人"理论存在一种误解;后者则为萨特的"他人"理论进行了辩护,这一辩护是有道理的。然而,Adrian Mirvish的辩护具有一定的缺陷,因此,有必要对"我思"这一概念进行简要地补充,为萨特的"他人"理论,尤其是冲突性人际关系理论的积极意义作进一步的可能的辩护。
This paper mainly focuses on Kathleen Wider and Adrian Mirvish’s studies on Sartre’s theory of others.Kathleen Wider’s attitude to this theory is critical but misapprehensive.While Adrian Mirvish renders reasonable defense for Sartre’s theory of others.However,Adrian Mirvish’s defense has certain defects.Therefore,it is necessary to make supplement to Cogito,hoping to further possible defense for Sartre’s theory of others,especially for the positive meaning of the conflict interpersonal relationship theory.
作者
赵桂梅
ZHAO Guimei(Department of Philosophy,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350,China)
出处
《燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2018年第2期14-18,24,共6页
Journal of Yanshan University:Philosophy and Social Science
关键词
萨特
他人
误解
辩护
路径学空间
Sartre
the Other
misapprehensive
defense
hodological space