摘要
《刑法》第114条和第115条到底是未遂犯和既遂犯的关系,还是基本犯与结果加重犯的关系,学界一直存有争议。两种解读模式在主观责任、犯罪形态和刑罚适用层面都存在着差异。但究其实质,"未遂犯—既遂犯"模式以法益实害结果为导向,而"基本犯—结果加重犯"模式以法益危险状态为导向。通过探究立法原意,立法者其实采用了"基本犯—结果加重犯"的立法模式。为了对公共安全法益起到更好的保护,我们应选择"基本犯—结果加重犯"的解读模式。
Academic field is always arguing whether the relationship of Article 114 and 115 in Criminal Law concerns attempted crime and accomplished crime or essential offense and aggravated offense.Two interpretation models have differences in subjective responsibility,criminal pattern and application of punishment.Both have their own crux.But to explore the essence,the relationship concerning attempted crime and accomplished crime is harmful-results-oriented,while essential offense and aggravated offense dangerous-state-oriented.By exploring the original intention of v-making,we can find that lawmakers adopt the model concerning essential offense and aggravated offense,which should be choosen,from the standpoint of criminal policy,for better protection of public security.
作者
赵英鹏
ZHAO Ying-peng(Beijing Normal University,Beijing100875,China)
出处
《广西政法管理干部学院学报》
2018年第1期45-52,共8页
Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词
]公共安全
危险状态
实害结果
立法原意
public security
dangerous state
harmful results
legislation intention
