摘要
为控制风险,现代民商合同制定律师费约定条款,约定违约方应支付守约方实现债权支出的律师费,但律师费约定条款在司法实务中仍存在一些问题,例如,约定律师费条款支持与否,比例如何确定等等。经研究,律师费系违约损害赔偿组成部分,因当事人协议成为诉讼必要费用,审判实践应结合劳动价值理论、违约程度等因素,遵循经营性收费高于行政性收费原则,兼顾公平,确定约定律师费比例。
To control risk,the contract of civil and commercial forms the provision of attorneys爷fee in which the defaulting party shall pay the attorney爷s fee when claimed creditor爷s right.But there still exisits problems in the judicial practice.For example,in which cases creditor爷s claiming attorneys爷fee shall be supported by the court are not sure,and if supports,how to determine the ratio,and so on.Through this research,leads to the conclusion that,based on the agreement,the attorney's fee shall be considered as part of claims for damages.When determing the attorneys爷fee,judges shall rely on the principle of fairness,combine the theory of labor value with the degree of default,also follow the principle that the operating fee shall be more expensive than the administrative fee.
作者
郑思清
ZHENG Si-qing(People’s Court of Luoyuan Country,Fuzhou,350600 China)
出处
《广西政法管理干部学院学报》
2018年第1期53-58,共6页
Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词
约定律师费
违约损害赔偿
诉讼必要费用
Provision of the attorneys'fee
claims for damages
the necessary fee of litigation