论我国监视居住制度适用中存在的问题及法律完善

The Problems Existing in the Theory of Residential Surveillance System in Our Country Apply and Law

2012年,我国对《刑事诉讼法》做了重大修订,内容涉及多个方面,如明确规定了非法证据排除标准,不得强迫犯罪嫌疑人、被告人自证其罪,侦查阶段可以委托辩护,明确了证人的出庭范围,将监视居住定位于羁押的替代措施等等,这次修订,进一步强化了对犯罪嫌疑人、被告人权利的保障,增强了刑事诉讼的公平、公正性,使刑事诉讼向更人道化方向发展。但一部新的法律实施以后,在司法实践中可能或多或少会出现一些问题,刑事诉讼法也不能幸免。笔者认为,修订后的刑事诉讼法在监视居住的期限设置、转化逮捕、折抵刑期等方面仍存在可进一步商榷、不清晰之处,应坚持实事求是的态度,对这些问题进行再讨论、研究,增强监视居住制度的可操作性和合理性。

In 2012袁a major revision of criminal procedure law of our country袁the content involves many aspects袁such as specific provision the illegal evidence exclusion criteria袁the criminal suspect or defendant shall not be forced to incriminate himself袁can entrust defense investigation phase袁has been clear about the witnesses to appear in court袁will be located in the custody of the alternative measures for residential surveillance袁etc.袁the revision袁further strengthened the rights of the criminal suspect or defendant袁security袁enhance the criminal procedural fairness袁impartiality袁make criminal procedure development to the direction of more humane.But after a new law enforcement in the judicial practice some problems more or less likely to appear袁criminal procedure law are not immune.The author believes that the revised criminal procedure law is set in the period of the residential surveillance袁conversion of arrest袁the sentence as still exist袁which can be used for further discussion袁not clear should stick to the attitude of seeking truth from facts袁have again to discuss these issues袁research袁enhance the maneuverability and rationality of residential surveillance system.