试论公益诉讼领域检察机关的举证责任

On the Burden of Proof of Procuratorial Organs in the Public Interest Litigation

检察机关被赋予权力参与公益诉讼后,原告的诉讼能力得到强化,原有的诉讼模式将被打破,随之而来的一系列诉讼问题有待解决。作为诉讼活动的当事人,必须解决的是举证责任分配的问题,当检察机关从刑事诉讼领域跨入行政诉讼和民事诉讼领域,是否会打破原有的举证责任规则?为了平衡诉讼当事人之间的能力差距以达到实质公平,是否需要专门为检察机关制定相应的公益诉讼举证责任规则?举证责任倒置原理在公益诉讼领域又该如何适用?

Procuratorial organs have the authority to participate in the public interest litigation and the plaintiff's litigation ability gets greatly strengthened袁which will break the original lawsuit pattern袁and a series of lawsuits problem are to be solved.In any litigation.The problem of distribution of evidential burden must be solved袁when prosecutors from the field criminal lawsuits enter into the field of administrative lawsuits and civil lawsuits.Whether the original rules of the burden of proof will be broken?In order to balance the ability gap between litigants to achieve substantive justice袁whether specific rules of burden of proof for procuratorial organs should be set up in the public interest litigation钥How to use the onus probandi inversion principle in the field of public interest litigation钥