期刊文献+

英语变体的认知演化——构式在动态模型中的作用

The Cognitive Evolution of Englishes——The Role of Constructions in the Dynamic Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Schneider的动态模型(2007)预测,正是词汇-句法接口展现了本土化阶段典型结构创新所浮现的最初痕迹。本文将展示构式语法理论怎样为该现象提供认知解释,然后通过聚焦比较关联构式(如The higher the price is,the more interesting the productis“价格越高,产品越有吸引力”)来阐明构式语法分析的优势。正如对国际英语语料库项目中多个语料库的数据统计分析所示,所有变体都呈现出相似的加工效应,但这些变体对半实体半图式性中观构式的依赖性则差异显著。 Schneider's Dynamic Model(2007)predicts that it is the lexicon-syntax interface that exhibits first traces of the emergence of characteristic structural innovations during the phase of Nativization.In this paper,I will show how a Construction Grammar approach provides a cognitive explanation for this phenomenon.I will then illustrate the advantages of a Construction Grammar analysis by focussing on Comparative Correlative(CC)constructions(e.g.The higher the price is,the more interesting the product is.;cf.Fillmore et al.1988;Sag 2010).As the statistical analysis of data from various corpora from the International Corpus of English project show,all varieties exhibit similar processing effects,but differ greatly with respect to their reliance on partly substantive,partly schematic meso-constructions.
作者 托马斯·霍夫曼(著) 李娜(译) 施春宏(译) Thomas Hoffinann;LI Na;SHI Chunhong(Beijing Language and Culture University,Beijing 100083 China)
出处 《国际汉语学报》 2017年第2期108-131,共24页 International Journal of Chinese Studies
基金 国家社科基金项目(15BYY001)和国家社科基金重大招标项目(12&ZD173)的支持
关键词 构式语法 构式 词汇一句法斜坡 本土化 Construction Grammar constructions lexis-syntax cline nativization
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献57

  • 1Atkins, B. T. S. 1987. Semantic ID tags. Corpus evidence for dictionary senses [A]. In Pro- ceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the UW Centre for the New Oxford English Dictionary [C]. Waterloo: The UW Centre for the New OED. 17-36.
  • 2Berez, A. &S.Gries. 2009. In defense of corpus-based methods: A behavioral profile analysis of polysemous get in English [A]. Proceedings of the 24 NWLC [C]. Department of Linguistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 157-166.
  • 3Church, K., W. Gale, P. Hanks, R. Hindle & R. Moon. 1994. Lexical substitutability [A]. In B. Atkins & A. Zampoli (eels). Computational Approaches to the Lexicon [C]. Oxford.. OUP. 153-177.
  • 4Divjak, D. 2006. Ways of intending: Delineating and structuring near synonyms [A]. In S. Gries & A. Stefanowitsch (eds.). Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-based Ap- proaches to Syntax and Lexis [C]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 19-56.
  • 5Divjak, D. & S. Gries. 2006. Ways of trying in Russian~ Clustering behavioral profiles [J]. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2(1) : 23-60.
  • 6Edmonds, P. & G. Hirst. 2002. Near synonyms and lexical choice[J].Computational Lin- guistics 28.. 105-144.
  • 7Firth, J. 1957. Papers in Linguistics [M]. New York: OUP.
  • 8Gries, S. 2001. A corpus linguistic analysis of English-ic vs-ical adjectives [J]. ICAME Journal 25: 65-108.
  • 9Gries, S. 2006. Corpus-based methods and cognitive semantics: The many meanings of to run [A]. In S. Gries & A. Stefanowitsch (eds.). Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis [C]. Berlin.. Mouton de Gruyter. 57-99.
  • 10Gries, S. 2010. Behavioral profiles: A fine-gained and quantitative approach in corpus- based lexical semantics [J]. The Mental Lexicon 5: 323-346.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部