期刊文献+

DTI脑连接组分析中分割模板的选择 被引量:2

Selection of Parcellation Atlas in DTI Brain Connectome Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于脑网络性质会因网络构建方法不同(如脑区划分模板、弥散磁共振成像(magnetic resonance imaging,MRI)模型、纤维素追踪算法和网络加权方案等)而出现较大的差异,针对弥散张量成像(diffusion tensor imaging,DTI),基于临床研究中的典型设置,研究了不同分割模板对脑网络拓扑参数的影响.参与本研究的75例健康老年人均接受了相同的认知功能综合评估和同一3T磁共振采集系统的全脑扫描.结果显示全局拓扑属性对脑区划分的空间尺度非常敏感,而对脑区划分原则并不是特别敏感.脑网络的模块化结构相对较稳定,不易受到节点划分尺度和节点划分原则的影响.中等分辨率的模板在大脑老化分析中具有更高的敏感性,可能更适合于常规DTI脑网络分析. Analysis of the structural connectomes based on diffusion magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)can show network attributes for segregation and integration in the human brain.However,it is reported that there are large discrepancies from those network measures,which may result from the network construction methodology(such as brain parcellations,DWI acquisition model,tractography algorithms and network weighting schemes).The influence of parcellation atlas on the topological network measures of diffusion tensor imaging(DTI)network with the typical setting used in many clinical applications were evaluated in this paper.The data of research were acquired in 75 healthy older adults who underwent several neuropsychological tests and structural MRI.It shows that those network measures are very sensitive to the spatial scales of brain parcellation.When the scale is close,the principle of parcellation doesn't change those measures that much.The modularity of brain network is relatively stable on different kinds of brain parcellation.The mesoscale atlas,which shows higher sensitivity in ageing study,may be an optimal choice for typical DTI network analysis.
作者 林岚 张柏雯 靳聪 吴水才 LIN Lan;ZHANG Baiwen;JIN Cong;WU Shuicai
出处 《北京工业大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第4期617-626,共10页 Journal of Beijing University of Technology
基金 国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2015BAI02B03) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71661167001) 北京市自然科学基金资助项目(7143171)
关键词 分割模板 弥散张量成像(DTI) 脑连接组 parcellation atlas diffusion tensor imaging(DTI) brain connectome
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献247

  • 1Madi S, Hasn KM, Narayana PA. Diffusion tensor imaging of in vivo and excised rat spinal cord at 7 T with an icosahedral encoding scheme. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2005; 53: 118-125.
  • 2Shepherd TM, Ozarslan E, et al. Stuctural insights from high-resolution diffusion tensor imaging and tractography of the isolated rat hippocampus Neuroimage, 2006; 32: 1499-1509.
  • 3Francis KH, Lee MSE, Fang MR, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of rodent brains in vivo using a 1.5T clinical MR scanner. Journal of Neurosicence Research Imaging,2006; 23: 747-751.
  • 4Mayer D, Zahr NM, Adalsteinnson E, et al. In vivo fiber tracking in the rat brain on a clinical 3T MRI system using s high strength insert gradient coil. NeuroImage, 2007; 35: 1077-1085.
  • 5Schwartz ED, Duda J, Shumsky JS, et al. Spinal cord diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking can identify white matter tract disruption and glial scar orientation following lateral funiculotomy. Journal of Neurotrauma, 2005; 22 ( 12 ) : 1388-1398.
  • 6Apama A. , Raymond DJ, Hasan GKM, et al. In vivoserial diffusion tensor imaging of experimental spinal cord injury. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 2006; 83: 801 -810.
  • 7Herrera J J, Chacko T, Narayana PA. Histological correlation of diffusion tensor imaging metrics in experimental spinal cord injury. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 2008 ; 86 : 443-447.
  • 8Zhang JY, van Zijl PCM , Laterra J, et al. Unique patterns of diffusion directionality in rat brain tumors revealed by high-resolution diffusion tensor MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2008; 58: 454-462.
  • 9Piedrafita SL, Martin MLG. Longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging in a rat brain glioma model. NMR in Biomedicine, 2008 ; 34 : 423-429.
  • 10Zhang JY, Richards LJ, Yarowsky P, et al. Three-dimensional anatomical characterization of the developing mouse brain by diffusion tensor microimagiong. NeurImage, 2003; 20: 1639-1648.

共引文献205

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部