期刊文献+

市场制度是否挤出道德偏好的实验经济学研究——研究现状与展望

Experimental Economics Research on whether the Market System Squeezes out Moral Preference——Research Status and Prospect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 市场化程度是否会对道德偏好产生挤出效应?这是一个包括经济学、社会学、政治学、心理学等多门学科普遍关注的前沿问题,对此至今仍难以取得一致认识。究其原因,主要在于现有的研究无法将市场制度与其他相关因素如收入、教育、法律和文化分离开来观察制度与行为之间的关系。而中国现存的集体主义村庄为此提供一个科学观察的极好际遇,从而为中国经济学家最终解决这一难题提供了现实基础。 Whether the marketization degree can produce crowding out effect to the morals?This is a frontier issue of general concern in many subjects including the economics,sociology,politics,psychology and so on.It is still difficult to get a consensus until now.The main reason is that the existing research can't separate the market system from other related factors,such as income,education,law and culture,and observe the relationship between system and behavior.The collectivist villages in China provide an excellent opportunity for scientific observation,which provides a realistic basis for Chinese economists to solve this problem finally.
作者 叶航 Ye Hang
机构地区 浙江大学
出处 《贵州省党校学报》 2018年第2期27-35,共9页 Journal of Guizhou Provincial Party School
基金 国家社科基金2015年度重大招标项目"社会经济制度如何影响个体行为偏好--基于中国集体主义村庄的田野调查与田野实验研究"(批准号:15ZDB134)的阶段性成果
关键词 市场制度 道德偏好 经济偏好 market system moral preference economic preferences
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献91

  • 1王思斌.村干部的边际地位与行为分析[J].社会学研究,1991(4):46-51. 被引量:102
  • 2丘海雄,徐建牛.市场转型过程中地方政府角色研究述评[J].社会学研究,2004(4):24-30. 被引量:141
  • 3Li, Hongbin and Scott Rozelle, Insider Privatization with a Tail: The Buyout Price and Performance of Privatized Firms in Rural China. UC Davis Working Paper, no. 01-017, November 2001. http: // ssrn. corn/abstract = 335120.
  • 4Nee, Victor , Social Inequalities in Reforming State Socialism: Between Redistribution and Markets in China. American Sociological Review, 56 (1991).
  • 5Oi, Jean, The Decades of Rural Reform in China: an Overview and Assessment, China Quarterly, vol. 159 (1999).
  • 6Walder, Andrew, Privatization and Elite Mobility, Rural China, 1979-1996. 2002. http://aparc. stanford.edu/publications/20205/.
  • 7Walder, Andrew,Sociological Dimensions of China's Economic Transition, Organization, Stratification, and Social Mobility. 2003. http: //aparc. stanford, edu/publications/20208/.
  • 8Walder, Andrew,Politics and Property in Transitional Economies: A Theory of Elite Opportunity. 2003. http: //aparc. stanford. edu/publications/20209/.
  • 9Bateman, I. , M. Cole, P. Cooper, S. Georgiou, D. Hadley, and G. Poe, "On Visible Choice Sets and Scope Sensitivity", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2004, 47 (1), 71-93.
  • 10Burtless, G. , "The Case for Randomized Field Trials in Economic and Policy Research", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995, 9 (2), 63-84.

共引文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部