期刊文献+

巴黎协定背景下全球减排博弈模拟研究 被引量:4

Game simulation on emission reduction under the background of the Paris Agreement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 构建了具有7个国家集团的全球多国家集团气候博弈集成评估模拟系统,针对《巴黎协定》背景下各国至2050年以及2100年的减排目标,分别对减排博弈的纳什均衡、博弈不确定性以及外部政策对减排博弈的影响展开了模拟分析。研究发现:在基准情景下,全球各国将在2030年后均选择不减排策略,全球至2100年升温达到2.62℃;而模型参数的不确定性也未能突破全球零减排的纳什均衡;而仅当在全球范围内对不减排采取惩罚措施时,全球零减排的纳什均衡点被打破。但在当前《巴黎协定》减排承诺下,为达到2℃的温控目标,加大2030—2050年的减排幅度至关重要,否则全球将在2040年左右突破2℃阈值。 A seven-region based integrated assessment model is established in this paper targeting to model the emission reduction game worldwide.Under the Paris Agreement,given the emission mitigation scheme by 2025/2030,2050,and 2100 for each country(region)as gaming strategy,the Nash equilibrium,the uncertainties of the game and the influences from external mitigation mechanisms are evaluated in each strategy combinations.In the reference scenario,no country(region)would take emission reduction after 2030 for the sake of their own optimal social welfare improvement,leading the global temperature rising to 2.62℃by 2100.The Nash equilibrium remains stable even when the climatic and economic parameters are disturbed.As an alternative,an external sanction on non-mitigation is applied;in this scenario,climate change mitigation propagates across countries(regions)according to various sanction levels,in which developed countries tend to adopt mitigation strategy earlier than developing countries as a response to the non-mitigation sanction.Meanwhile,under the Paris Agreement,simulation also reveals the emission reduction from 2030 to 2050 has become crucial for making the 2℃threshold viable if no extra mitigations are implemented before 2030.An emission reduction target higher than the“developed and developing countries cutting emission 80%and 50%on 1990 level by 2050”is required in this circumstance,otherwise the global temperature will overshoot 2℃around 2040.
作者 吴静 朱潜挺 王诗琪 王铮 WU Jing;ZHU Qian-Ting;WANG Shi-Qi;WANG Zheng(Institutes of Science and Development,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China;School Public Policy and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China;China University of Petroleum,Beijing 102249,China;Key Labortory of Geographical Information Science,Ministry of State Education of China,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China)
出处 《气候变化研究进展》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第2期182-190,共9页 Climate Change Research
基金 国家重大研究计划(973)项目(2016YFA0602702) 国家社会科学基金项目(14CGJ025) 国家自然科学基金项目(41501127)
关键词 气候博弈 减排 巴黎协定 2℃目标 Climate game Emission reduction Paris Agreement 2℃target
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献87

  • 1潘家华.后京都国际气候协定的谈判趋势与对策思考[J].气候变化研究进展,2005,1(1):10-15. 被引量:8
  • 2陈文颖,吴宗鑫,何建坤.全球未来碳排放权“两个趋同”的分配方法[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(6):850-853. 被引量:96
  • 3张海滨.中国在国际气候变化谈判中的立场:连续性与变化及其原因探析[J].世界经济与政治,2006(10):36-43. 被引量:29
  • 4陈迎.国际气候制度的演进及对中国谈判立场的分析[J].世界经济与政治,2007(2):52-59. 被引量:20
  • 5Michael Richards, "A Review of the Effectiveness of Developing Country Participation in the Climate Change Convention Negotiations," Working Paper of Oversea Development Institute, UK, December 2001 ,http://www. odi. org. uk.
  • 6Robert D. Putnam, “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two- Level Games,”International Organization, Vol. 42, No. 3, 1988, pp. 427 -460.
  • 7[美]詹姆斯·多尔蒂和小罗伯特·普法尔茨格拉夫著,阎学通等译.《争论中的国际关系理论》.北京:世界知识出版社,2003年版.第645-646页.
  • 8Gorild Heggdund, “China' s Climate Change Policy: Domestic and International Developments,”Asian Perspective, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2007, pp. 155-191.
  • 9Joanna I. Lewis, "China' s Strategic Priorities in International Climate Change Negotiations," The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 1,2007/2008 ,pp. 155 - 174.
  • 10Coalition of Rainforest Nations, http://www, rainforestcoalition. org/eng/; “Reducing Emissions From Ddorestation in Developing Countries: Approaches to Stimulate Action,”January 30, 2007, http://unfccc. int/files/methods_and_science/lulucf/application/pdf/bolivia, pdf.

共引文献63

同被引文献52

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部