期刊文献+

经皮肾镜取石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的临床有效性分析 被引量:1

Clinical efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for the treatment of incarcerated upper ureteral calculi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨经皮肾镜取石术以及输尿管镜碎石术治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的效果。方法:收治嵌顿性输尿管上段结石患者168例,分为对照组和研究组,各84例。对照组给予经尿道输尿管镜碎石术治疗,研究组给予经皮肾镜取石术治疗。结果:研究组结石清除率高于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组手术时间以及住院时间均显著少于对照组(P<0.05);研究组术后并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05);两组术后NGAL水平均显著性高于术前,研究组低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:对比经尿道输尿管镜碎石术,针对嵌顿性输尿管上段结石患者应用经皮肾镜取石术治疗,其结石清除率更高,并发症发生率更低,住院时间更短,对肾功能影响更小。 Objective:To investigate the effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for the treatment of incarcerated upper ureteral calculi.Methods:168 cases of incarcerated upper ureteral calculi were selected.They were divided into the control group and the study group with 84 cases in each group.The control group was treated with transurethral ureteroscopic lithotripsy,and the study group was treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Results:Stone clearance rate of study group was higher than the control group(P<0.05);the operation time and hospitalization time were significantly less than the control group(P<0.05);the study group of patients with postoperative complications was lower than the control group(P<0.05);the level of NGAL in the two groups was significantly higher than that before the operation,and the study group was lower than the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with transurethral ureteroscopic lithotripsy,percutaneous lithotripsy for patients with impacted upper ureteral calculi has higher stone clearance rate,lower incidence of complications,shorter hospitalization time and less impact on renal function.
作者 李少康 Li Shaokang(People's Hospital of Shanglin County,Guangxi 530500)
出处 《中国社区医师》 2018年第10期70-71,73,共3页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 经皮肾镜取石术 输尿管镜碎石术 嵌顿性输尿管上段结石 Percutaneous nephrolithotomy Ureteroscopic lithotripsy Incarcerated upper ureteral calculi
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献85

  • 1何谢夫.经皮肾镜取石与输尿管镜碎石治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石疗效比较[J].中外医疗,2012,31(28):59-60. 被引量:7
  • 2李淦洪,王亚东,杨俊,李乾伟,王勤.封堵取石导管联合URL与PCNL治疗输尿管上段结石的疗效比较[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2014,3(3):161-164. 被引量:2
  • 3李逊,雷鸣,袁坚,曾国华,单炽昌,郭彬,陈文忠,刘冠昭.微创经皮肾穿刺取石和经尿道输尿管镜碎石治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的疗效比较[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2004,19(7):388-390. 被引量:234
  • 4吴忠,姜昊文,张华魏,陈智新,历春军,丁强,张元芳.钬激光碎石术治疗泌尿系结石(附1216例报告)[J].中国微创外科杂志,2006,6(7):529-531. 被引量:35
  • 5Gu Xiao-jian,Lu Jian Lin,Xu Yan.Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy[J].World Journal of Urology.2013(6)
  • 6Mostafa Khalil.Management of impacted proximal ureteral stone: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy[J].Urology Annals.2013(2)
  • 7Zhongsheng Yang,Leming Song,Donghua Xie,Min Hu,Zuofeng Peng,Tairong Liu,Chuance Du,Jiuqing Zhong,Wen Qing,Shulin Guo,Lunfeng Zhu,Lei Yao,Jianrong Huang,Difu Fan,Zhangqun Ye.Comparative Study of Outcome in Treating Upper Ureteral Impacted Stones Using Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With Aid of Patented System or Transurethral Ureteroscopy[J].Urology.2012(6)
  • 8Islam A. Ghoneim,Mohamed N. El-Ghoneimy,Ashraf E. El-Naggar,Khaled M. Hammoud,Mohamed Y. El-Gammal,Ahmed A. Morsi.Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Impacted Upper Ureteral Stones: A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Stented and Non-stented Techniques[J].Urology.2010(1)
  • 9Yung-Shun Juan,Jung-Tsung Shen,Ching-Chia Li,Chii-Jye Wang,Shu-Mien Chuang,Chun-Hsiung Huang,Wen-Jeng Wu.Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy in the Management of Impacted, Large, Proximal Ureteral Stones[J].Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences.2008(4)
  • 10Christian Seitz,Enis Tanovic,Zeljko Kikic,Harun Fajkovic.Impact of Stone Size, Location, Composition, Impaction, and Hydronephrosis on the Efficacy of Holmium:YAG-Laser Ureterolithotripsy[J].European Urology.2007(6)

共引文献130

同被引文献23

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部