期刊文献+

装配型自有品牌产品采购策略研究

Research on Purchasing Strategy of Assembled Private Brand Product
下载PDF
导出
摘要 核心部件采购策略直接影响装配型自有品牌产品质量协同效果。文章基于文献研究与博弈分析方法,构建装配型自有品牌产品零部件采购博弈模型,比较分析两类采购策略的优劣性和策略选择条件。研究表明:采购顺序调整直接影响装配型自有品牌产品质量协同效果;同步采购可实现更高的利润,但对质量协同效果次优,顺序采购虽可实现更好质量协调,但并非零售商占优策略。 The purchasing strategy of core comonents directly affects the assembly-type owned brand product quality synergies.Based on the literature research and game analysis method,the author builds the game model of the components of the self-branded parts and components,compares and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the two types of purchasing strategies.The results show that the purchase order adjustment directly affects the assembly-type owned brand products quality synergistic effect;simultaneous procurement can achieve higher profits,but the quality of collaborative effect is sub optimum,although the procurement can achieve better quality coordination,it is not the dominant strategy of retailers.
作者 江烨 陈瑞义 JIANG Ye;CHEN Ruiyi(Business School,Jiangsu Open University,Nanjing 210036,China;Management School,Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Nanjing 210003,China)
出处 《无锡职业技术学院学报》 2017年第6期54-57,共4页 Journal of Wuxi Institute of Technology
基金 江苏高校哲学社会科学研究项目"走出自有品牌产品质量管理困境的策略研究"(2015SJD251) 江苏高校哲学社会科学研究项目"电商跨界经营自有品牌的策略研究"(2015SJB010) 国家自然科学基金青年项目"消费者知情购仿行为形成 演变与治理策略研究"(71501102)
关键词 装配型零售商 自有品牌 谈判顺序 质量协作 assembly retailer private brand negotiation order quality collaboration
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献14

  • 1BANKER R D, KHOSLA I K, SINHA K. Quality and Competition[J]. Management Science, 1998, 44 (9): 1 179-1 192.
  • 2SHEREFKIN R. Ford's Recall Challenge[J]. Automotive News, 2002, 62(5985): 8-9.
  • 3MOORTHY K S. Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly[J]. Marketing Science, 1988,7(2):141-168.
  • 4MATSUBAYASHI N. Price and Quality Competition: The Effect of Differentiation and Vertical Inte gration [J]. European Journal of Operational Re search, 2007, 180(2): 907-921.
  • 5KLASTORIN T, TSAI W. New Product Introduc tion: Timing, Design, and Pricing[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2004, 6(4) 302-320.
  • 6CHOUDHARY V, GHOSE A, MUKHOPADHYAY T, et al. Personalized Pricing and Quality Differentiation[J]. Management Science,2005,51(7):1 120-1 130.
  • 7NAIR A, NARASIMHAN N. Dynamics of Competing with Quality- and Advertising Based Goodwill [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 175(1): 462-474.
  • 8GURNANI H, ERKOC M, LUO Y. Impact of Product Pricing and Timing of Investment Decisions on Supply Chain Co-Opetition[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 180(1) : 228-248.
  • 9GURNANI H, ERKOC M. Supply Contracts in Manufacture-Retailer Interactions with Manufacture Qual ity and Retailer Effort-Induced Demand[J]. Naval Research Logistics, 2008, 55(3): 200-217.
  • 10VOROS J. The Dynamics of Price, Quality and Productivity Improvement Decisions[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 170 (3): 809-823.

共引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部