从“为了生活的地理”到“实践地理”——美国国家地理课程标准修订对我国的启示被引量：3

From Geography for Life to Doing Geography:The revision of American National Geography Curriculum and the Enlightenment to China

下载PDF

导出

摘要美国《为了生活的地理:国家地理课程标准》从理念上强化了“实践地理”的学习方式;结构上简化呈现了6大要素、18条标准,增加了案例;内容上增加了地理科学的最新研究进展;形式上以内容为线索,各学段并列呈现。美国课程标准的修订对我国地理课程改革有一定的启示。“实践地理”意味着在地理知识技能之外强化了地理视角,适时将地理科学发展前沿内容纳入中学地理课程,适当考虑课程标准形式的可读性。 Geography for Life:National Geography Standard(Second Edition)emphasizes the importance of“doing Geography”from the perspective of idea.It include six main elements and eighteen standards,and cases are the added part.In the content,it added the current development of geography.In the form of the Geography for Life,the content of different stage of studying is presented.The revision of American curriculum standards has some enlightenment for Chinese geography curriculum reform.“Doing geography”means the strength of geographic perspectives.It integrates the frontiers of development about geography into the middle school geography course,and considers the readability of the curriculum standard.

作者刘兰郭永馨 LIU Lan;GUO Yongxin(College of Tourism,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai,200234;Geography Education Study Centre of Shanghai in East China Normal University,Shanghai,200062;the NO.1 Middle School in Songjiang Shanghai,Shanghai,201600)

机构地区上海师范大学旅游学院上海市地理教育教学研究基地上海市松江一中

出处《现代基础教育研究》 CSSCI 2018年第1期109-115,共7页 Research on Modern Basic Education

基金上海高校“立德树人”人文社会科学重点研究基地和上海市地理教育教学研究基地课题“地理课程标准国际比较研究”(项目编号:SHGE2014A02) 上海师范大学文科项目“地理课程价值观国际比较研究——基于国际地理课程标准比较视阈”(项目编号:A-0230-15-001011)的阶段性研究成果

关键词实践地理地理课程标准课程理念 doing geography geography curriculum standard curriculum idea

分类号 G633.55 [文化科学—教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献1

1王小禹,袁孝亭.美国地理课程标准实施过程中的问题及影响因素分析[J].外国中小学教育,2006(10):34-39. 被引量：1

二级参考文献10

1American Association for the Advancement of Science. Blueprints for Reform [R].Oxford University press USA,1988.
2Peter Anthamatten.State Geography Standards in 2004 [J].Thc Journal of Geography,.Jul/Aug 2004.
3Guidelines for geographic education: Element and secondary schools.1984 [Ml.Washington, D.C. :National Council for Geographic Education and Association of American Geographers.
4Sarah.Witham Bednarz.Nine years on:Examing implementation of the national geography standards[J].The Journal of Geography, May/Jun 2003.
5Marianne Kenney.The Implementation of the National Geography standards in Colorado: To Everything There Is a season[J].The Social Studies, Nov/Dec 2004.
6Charies R Gildersleeve.Uneasy Symbiosis:Nebraska's Implementation of National Standards in Geography [J].The Social Studies, Washington: Nov/Dec2004.
7Robert W Morrill.The Virginia Standards of Learning:Where Is Geography for Life [J].The Social Studies, Washington: Nov/Dec 2004.
8Richard G Boehm, David J Rutherford.Implementation of National Geography Standards in the Social Studies, A Ten-Year Retrospective[J].The Social Studies,Washington: Nov/Dec 2004.
9Sarah.Witham Bednarz.Nine years on:Examing implementation of the national geography standards[J].The Journal of Geography, Indiana : May/Jun 2003.
10S Kay Gandy, Derreil P Kruger.An Assessment of Influences on the Implementation of the National Geography Standards [J].The Journal of Geography,Indiana : Jul/Aug 2004.