恺撒《内战记》真实性考述

A Study of Authenticity of Caesar's Commentarii de Bello Civile

恺撒《内战记》由于具有政治性和宣传性的特点,自发表之日其真实性便受到质疑。通过对比同时代阿庇安、苏维托尼乌斯、狄奥·卡西乌斯、普鲁塔克等人对恺撒和庞培内战的记述,以平行史料校正恺撒的记述,可发现恺撒对内战的记述存在缺失和不实之处,《内战记》并非完全忠于史实。

With the characteristic of political and propaganda,the authenticity of“commentarii de Bello Civile”of Caesar has been questioned since the date of publication.The records about the civil war of Caesar have some defects and inaccuracies,the“commentarii de Bello Civile”is not totally true to the historical facts by contrasting the contemporary record about the civil war of Caesar and Pompey of Appian,Suetonius,Dio Cassius and Plutarch with the parallel historical data.