期刊文献+

交流语言认知研究中假被试的使用

The Use of Camouflaged Subjects in the Study of Communicative Language Cognition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 交流语言认知研究中,假被试的使用不仅是方法论问题,也涉及到交流语言认知加工特征的分析和交流理论的建构。文章拟归纳和述评交流语言加工特征分析中假被试的使用,以及交流语言认知理论建构中假被试的使用。具体来说,假被试使用易化了交流语言发生和理解特征的分析,但也降低了交流互动的多样性;假被试的使用方便了交流语言认知理论的探讨,但也降低了交流情境的丰富性。 In the study of communicative language cognition,the use of camouflaged subjects is not only methodological,but also involves the analysis of communicative language processing characteristics and the construction of communication theory.This paper intends to summarize and review the use of camouflaged subjects in the analysis of language processing characteristics and the use of camouflaged subjects in the construction of the cognitive theory of the communication language.Specifically,the use of camouflaged subjects facilitates the analysis of the occurrence and understanding of communicative language,but also reduces the diversity of communication and interaction.The use of camouflaged subjects is convenient for communicating with language cognition theory,but it also reduces the richness of communication situations.
作者 张恒超 ZHANG Hengchao(Department of Psychology,School of Law,Tianjin University of Commerce,Tianjin 300134,China)
出处 《心理技术与应用》 2018年第3期169-176,共8页 Psychology(Techniques and Applications)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(16YJC190029)
关键词 交流 语言 假被试 communication language camouflaged subject
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献105

  • 1杨丽霞,陈永明,周治金.不同理解能力的个体在词汇加工中的抑制机制[J].心理学报,2001,33(4):294-299. 被引量:13
  • 2沈德立,白学军.高效率学习的心理机制研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(1):2-6. 被引量:83
  • 3Araban, S. , Zainalipour, H. , Saadi, R. H. R., Javdan, M. , Sezide, K. , & Sajjadi, S. (2012). Study of cooperative learning effects on self-efficacy and academic achievement in English lesson of high school students. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2 (9), 8524 - 8526.
  • 4Arnold, ]. E. , Tanenhaus, M. K. , Altmann, R. J. , & Fagnano, M. (2004). The old and thee, uh, new. Psychological Science, 15, 578 -582.
  • 5Bangerter, A. , & Clark, H. H. (2003). Navigating joint projects with dialogue. Cognitive Science, 27 (2) , 195 - 225.
  • 6Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2002). Anchoring comprehension in linguistic precedents. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 391 -418.
  • 7Bezuidenhout, A. (2012). Perspective taking in conversation: A defense of speaker non-egocentricity. Journal of Pragmatics, in press.
  • 8B6gels, S., Schriefers, H., Vonk, W., & Chwilla, D. J. (2011). Pitch accents in context: How listeners process accentuation in referential communication. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2022 -2036.
  • 9Branigan, H. P., Pit'kering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75(2), B13 -B25.
  • 10Brenuan, S. E. , Chen, X., Dickinson, C. A. , Neider, M. B. , & Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). Coordinating cognition: The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search. Cognitior, 106 (3), 1465 - 1477.

共引文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部