期刊文献+

如何规范报告复杂干预性系统评价和Meta分析:PRISMA-CI解读 被引量:2

An Introduction of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Complex Interventions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 系统评价和Meta分析优先报告的条目(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis,PRISMA)系列报告规范的陆续发表在一定程度上规范了系统评价/Meta分析报告,本文主要介绍PRISMA-CI的报告条目,并对其进行解读,期望为国内研究人员报告复杂干预性系统评价和Meta分析提供借鉴和参考。 The preferred reporting items for systematic review and Meta-analysis guidelines were published to improve the reporting of systematic reviews and Meta-analysis.The study mainly introduced and interpreted the items of PRISMA-CI,in order to help domestic researchers to perform and report the systematic review and Meta-analysis of complex interventions by PRISMA-CI.
作者 田金徽 马文娟 苟铃珠 陈吉 孙月 王盼杰 张俊华 TIAN Jin-hui;MA Wen-juan;GOU Ling-zhu;CHEN Ji;SUN Yue;WANG Pan-jie;ZHANG Jun-hua(Evidence-based Medicine Center,School of Basic Medical Sciences,Lanzhou University,Gansu Lanzhou 730000,China;Key Laboratory of Clinical Translational Research and Evidence-based Medicine of Gansu Province,Gansu Lanzhou 730000,China;The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University,Gansu Lanzhou 730000,China;School of Nursing of Lanzhou University,Gansu Lanzhou 730000,China;The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University,Gansu Lanzhou 730000,China;Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin 300193,China)
出处 《中国药物评价》 2018年第1期62-65,共4页 Chinese Journal of Drug Evaluation
关键词 复杂干预 系统评价 复杂干预性系统评价和Meta分析报告规范(PRISMA-CI) META分析 Complex Interventions Systematic Reviews Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Complex Interventions(PRISMA-CI) Meta-Analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献92

  • 1祝世讷.中医药自主创新的战略优势——复杂性[J].天津中医药,2007,24(1):5-7. 被引量:7
  • 2MRC.A framework for the development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health [ R ] .London: Medical Research Council, 2000 : 18.
  • 3Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al.Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance [ J ] .BMJ,2008,337: a1655.
  • 4Dowding DW, Cheyne HL, Hundley V, et al.Complex interventions in midwifery care: Reflections on the design and evaluation of an algorithm for the diagnosis of labour [ J ] .Midwif- ery,2011,27 ( 5 ): 654-659.
  • 5Brown CA, Lilford RJ.The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review [ J ] .BMC Med Res Methodol, 2006,6: 54.
  • 6Hussey MA, Hughes JP.Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials [ J ] .Contemp Clin Trials,2007 (28): 182-191.
  • 7Preference Collaborative Review Group.Patients' preferences within randomised trials: systematic review and patient level meta-analysis [ J ] .BMJ, 2008,337 : a 1864.
  • 8King M, Nazareth I, Lampe F, et al.Impact of participants and physician intervention preferences on randomised trials: a systematic review [ J ] .JAMA, 2005,293: 1089-1099.
  • 9Torgerson D J, Klaber-Moffett J, Russell IT.Patient preferences in randomised trials : threat or opportunily? [ J ] .J Health Serv Res Policy, 1996,1 : 194-197.
  • 10Guyattg, Sackett D, Taylor DW, et al.determining optimal therapy-randomized trials in individual patients [ J ] .N Engl J Med, 1986,314: 889-892.

共引文献49

同被引文献29

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部