摘要
目的对比预成纤维桩和可塑纤维桩在口腔修复中的临床疗效。方法选取2016年6月~2017月9月我院经口腔修复的患者140例,随机分为A、B两组,A组采取预成纤维桩材料治疗,B组采取可塑纤维桩材料治疗,观察两组的临床疗效、总体满意度、常见并发症的发生率、单颗纤维桩修复时间。结果 A组修复有效率为91.51%,显著高于B组(78.95%);A组的总体满意度为92.86%,显著高于B组(81.43%);A组的并发症发生率仅为10.00%,显著低于B组(22.86%);A组单颗纤维桩修复时间平均为(72.49±16.82)min,明显低于B组(98.25±21.37)min(P<0.05)。结论应用预成纤维桩治疗具有较高的临床疗效、较低的并发症发生率,可提高患者的预后,值得推广。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of prefabricated fiber posts and plastic fiber piles in prosthodontics.Methods 140 patients undergoing prosthodontics in our hospital from June 2016 to September 2017 were selected and randomly divided into two groups:group A treated with prefabricated fiber posts and group B treated with plastic fiber piles.The clinical efficacy,overall satisfaction,incidence of common complications and restoration time of single fiber post were observed.Results The success rate of repair in group A was 91.51%,which was significantly higher than group B(78.95%).The overall satisfaction in group A(92.86%)was significantly better than group B(81.43%).The incidence of complications in group A was only 10.00%,which was significantly lower than that in group B(22.86%).The mean time required for single fiber post in group A(72.49±16.82)min was significantly shorter than group B(98.25±21.37min)(P<0.05).Conclusion The application of prefabricated fiber posts has a higher clinical efficacy,a lower incidence of complications and can improve the prognosis of patients,which is worth promoting.
作者
乐凯艳
夏章平
竺王玉
LE Kaiyan;XIA Zhangping;ZHU Wangyu(Department of Stomatology,Zhoushan Hospital in Zhejiang Province,Zhoushan 316022,China)
出处
《中国现代医生》
2018年第7期67-70,共4页
China Modern Doctor
基金
浙江省科技计划项目(2014C33244)
关键词
预成纤维桩
可塑纤维桩
口腔修复
对比应用研究
Prefabricated fiber posts
Plastic fiber piles
Prosthodontics
Comparative study