摘要
著作权集体管理行为作为连接著作权人与使用者的桥梁,有着私人自治的制度蕴意,以及复合式构造的法律关系特点。考虑到我国集体管理制度的现实问题,对其法律属性的界定,既不能将其归类于信托性质的法律关系,也不宜将其解读成为行纪行为的法律属性。因此,在具体的司法认定过程中,既不能变相地否定或者剥夺著作权人的专有权利,也需要将其与版权代理行为的个体维权,作出明确地界分,以充分维护著作权人的合法利益,以及有效促进集体管理制度的良好运行。
As a bridge between the copyright owner and the user,the collective management behavior of copyright has the meaning of the system of private autonomy and the legal relation characteristics of the compound structure.Considering the practical problems of the collective management system in China,for its defi nition of legal attributes,it cannot be classifi ed as the legal relations of trust,nor should it be interpreted as the legal attributes of commission agency behavior.Therefore,in the process of a specific judicial definition,it not only cannot deny or deprive of the exclusive rights of the copyright owner in disguise,but also need to make a clear division between the collective management behaviors and the copyright agent behaviors of the individuals to safeguard right,so as to fully safeguard the legitimate interests of the copyright owner and effectively promote the collective management system to function well.
出处
《电子知识产权》
CSSCI
2018年第3期47-52,共6页
Electronics Intellectual Property
基金
中南财经政法大学研究生教育创新计划项目资助(项目编号:20171151)
关键词
集体管理行为
非法集体管理
法律属性
司法适用
Collective management
Illegal collective management
Legal attributes
Judicial application