摘要
在判断某项技术是否具有"创造性"时,如果仅仅从技术手段、技术方案出发,而不是从技术问题出发,容易造成事后诸葛亮;如果仅仅考虑技术原理,而不是考虑对比文件(现有技术)的实际状况,也容易出现问题。实践中,应当充分考虑来自现有技术的明确的、可信的教导;如果认为本领域的技术人员有能力对现有技术做出突破,要给出充分的理由;技术方案的可行性并不能表明该方案对本领域的技术人员而言就一定是显而易见的。
If we start from technical means and technical solutions when judging the inventiveness of a technology.rather than from technical problems,it is easy to cause Hindsight bias.If we only consider the technical principles,rather than consider the actual prior art,it will easily cause Hindsight bias.Anything beyond the objective and reasonable expectation of persons skilled in the art is hindsight bias.We should consider the explicit and credible characteristic of the prior technology.It needs sufficient reason to determine whether the technicians make the breakthrough for the prior technology.The feasibility of one technical dose not mean that it is obvious to technicians in.this area.
出处
《电子知识产权》
CSSCI
2018年第3期70-73,共4页
Electronics Intellectual Property
关键词
创造性
技术启示
事后诸葛亮
Inventiveness
Technical motivation
Hindsight Bias