期刊文献+

心理干预在肝硬化患者护理中的应用效果分析 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析心理干预在肝硬化患者护理中的应用效果。方法 80例肝硬化患者,随机分为常规组和实验组,每组40例。常规组患者实施常规护理,实验组患者实施心理护理干预,观察比较两组患者的护理满意度和住院时间及治疗后焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分。结果常规组不满意12例,比较满意18例,非常满意10例,护理满意度为70%;实验组不满意4例,比较满意14例,非常满意22例,护理满意度为90%;两组护理满意度比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。常规组住院时间为(20.33±4.74)d,实验组住院时间为(10.86±2.01)d,实验组住院时间明显短于常规组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,常规组SAS评分为(48.53±5.96)分、SDS评分为(45.21±4.93)分,实验组SAS评分为(38.17±4.91)分、SDS评分为(37.38±4.22)分,治疗后实验组SAS、SDS评分均明显低于常规组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在肝硬化患者护理中应用心理干预,效果显著,值得广泛推广。
作者 裴绣萍
出处 《中国现代药物应用》 2018年第7期186-187,共2页 Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献56

  • 1Fu-Rong Sun,Ying Wang,Bing-Yuan Wang,Jing Tong,Dai Zhang and Bing Chang Department of Gastroenterology,First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University,Shenyang 110001,China.Relationship between model for end-stage liver disease score and left ventricular function in patients with end-stage liver disease[J].Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,2011,10(1):50-54. 被引量:7
  • 2Amodio P, Wenin H, Del Piccolo F, et al. Variability of trail making test, symbol digit test and line trait test in normal people. A normative study taking into account age-dependent decline and sociobiological variables. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2002, 14: 117-131.
  • 3Assy N, Rosser BG, Grahame GR, et al. Risk of sedation for upper GI endoscopy exacerbating subclinical hepatic encephalop- athy in patients with cirrhosis. Gastrointest Endosc, 1999,49: 690-694.
  • 4Khamaysi I, William N, Olga A, et al. Sub-clinical hepatic en- cephalopathy in cirrhotic patients is not aggravated by sedation with propofol compared to midazolam: a randomized controlled study. J Hepatology, 2011,54:72-77.
  • 5Amor6s A, Aparicio JR, Garmendia M, et al. Deep sedation with propofol does not precipitate hepatic encephalopathy during elective upper endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc, 2009, 70 : 262 -268.
  • 6Correia LM, Bonilha DQ, Gomes GF, et al. Sedation during up- per GI endoscopy in cirrhotic outpatients: a randomized, con- trolled trial comparing propofol and fentanyl with midazolam and fentanyl. Gastrointest Endosc, 2011,73:45-51.
  • 7Berzigotti A, Gilabert R, Abraldes JG, et al. Noninvasiveprediction of clinically significant portal hypertension andesophageal varices in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis.Am J Gastroenterol, 2008,103(5): 1159-1167.
  • 8Korula J, Ralls P. The effects of chronic endoscopic varicealsclerotherapy on portal pressure in cirrhotics. Gastroenterology,1991, 101(3): 800-805.
  • 9D'amico G, Garcia-Pagan JC, Luca A, et al. Hepatic veinpressure gradient reduction and prevention of variceal bleedingin cirrhosis: a systematic review. Gastroenterology, 2006,131(5): 1611-1624.
  • 10Takuma Y,Nouso K, Morimoto Y, et al. Measurement of spleenstiffness by acoustic radiation force impulse imaging identifiescirrhotic patients with esophageal varices. Gastroenterology,2013,144(1):92-101.

共引文献116

同被引文献46

引证文献7

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部