期刊文献+

2017年高考语文病句试题分析及教学建议 被引量:1

The Analysis and Teaching Suggestions of Chinese Ungram maticals sentences for College Entrance Examination in 2017
下载PDF
导出
摘要 病句题符合《普通高中语文新课程标准》中对语法、语义和逻辑等多角度、综合性地考查学生语言应用能力的要求。2017年8套高考卷中有6套考查了病句,并且都以客观题的形式出现。虽然病句分析题在试卷中占的分数并不算高,但含金量不低,一道病句题不但可以考查语法、语义这些基础语言知识,还能与政治、经济、文化、法律等社会问题相结合。为了提高语病分析教学的针对性和科学性,以及提高语言的规范性,高中语文语病教学应该以夯实基础语言知识为主,培养和规范学生的语言文字运用技巧和能力,并以社会时政和当前先进文化为主导方向更加全面、综合性地提高学生的语病分析能力。 The subject line is in line with the requirements 0f grammar,semantics and logic in the standard of Chinese new curriculum in ordinary high school,and comprehensive examination of students'language application ability.In 2017,there are 6 sets of exam papers,6 of which have been examined and examined,and they all appear in the form of objective questions.Although pragmatically analysis problem in test scores is not high,but the value is not low.A pragmatica topic not only can check syntax,semantics,the basic language knowledge,also with the political,economic,cultural,legal and other social problems.In order to improve the pertinence of ill-chosen expression analysis of the teaching and scientific,and improve the standardization of language,high school Chinese speech disorders teaching should give priority in order to strengthen the basic language knowledge,to cultivate and standardize students'language with skill and ability,and to the social politics and the current advanced culture as the leading direction of a more comprehensive,integrated to improve the studentsJ ability of illchosen expression analysis.
作者 李辰 Li Chen(College of Liberal Arts,Qufu Normal University,Qufu 274165,China)
出处 《齐鲁师范学院学报》 2018年第2期31-35,共5页 Journal of Qilu Normal University
关键词 高考 语文卷 病句题 语言 College entrance examination Chinese volume Pragmatica topic Language
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献23

  • 1万春.高考名篇名句默写规律探寻及应对策略[J].四川文理学院学报,2007,17(F06):61-62. 被引量:3
  • 2王小华.北京师范大学硕士学位论文,2003:26,41.
  • 3James,L.R.,Demaree,R.G.,& Wolf,G.Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias.Journal of Applied Psychology,1984,69(l):85-98.
  • 4Kozlowski,S.W.J.,& Hattrup,K.A disagreement about within-group agreement:Disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus.Journal of Applied Psychology,1992,77(2):161-167.
  • 5James,L.R.,Demaree,R.G.,& Wolf,G.Rwg:An assessment of within-group interrater agreement.Journal of Applied Psychology,1993,78(2):306-309.
  • 6Lindell,MichaeK.;Brandt,ChristinaJ.Assessing Interrater Agreement on the Job Relevance of a Test:A Comparison of the CVI,T,rWG(J),and r*WG(J) Indexes.Journal of Applied Psychology,1999,84(4):640-647.
  • 7Cohen,Ayala;Doveh,Etti; Eick,Uri.Statistical Properties of the rWG(J) Index of Agreement.Psychological Methods,2001,6(3):297-310.
  • 8Dunlap,William P.; Burke,Michael J.; Smith-Crowe,Kristin.Accurate Tests of Statistical Significance for rWG and Average Deviation Interrater Agreement Indexes.Journal of Applied Psychology,2003,88(2):356-362.
  • 9Fin,R.H.A note on estimating the reliability of categorical data.Educational and psychological measurement,1970,30:71-76.
  • 10James,L.R.Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement.Journal of Applied Psychology,1982,67:219-229.

共引文献73

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部