无效合同的返还与占有恢复关系返还的冲突与区分

Conflicts and Distinctions: Return of Invalid Contract and Return of Occupied Recovery Relationship

基于"合同无效"而产生的返还责任与基于"占有恢复关系"而产生的返还责任,二者应该是泾渭分明的。但在现行民事立法中,并没有对二者严格区分,从而导致在合同无效的语境下也存在着适用《物权法》相关规定的可能,这在一定程度上可能损害当事人的利益。在我国民法典分则的编纂中,应该在"合同编"中设立单独的"返还单元",既全面规制合同无效后的返还,也可规制"准合同"的返还问题,从而也弥补"准合同"规定的不足。

The responsibility for return based on“contract ineffectiveness”and the responsibility for return based on“recovery of possession”should be clearly defined.However,in China's current civil legislation,there is no strict distinction between the two,resulting in the existence of the possibility of applying the relevant provisions of the“Property Law”in the context of contract invalidation,which may,to some extent,damage the interests of the parties.In the compilation of the sub-sections of our Civil Code,a separate“return unit”should be established in the contracts”to fully regulate the return after the contract is invalid,and also to regulate the return of'"quasi-contracts”to make up for the'"Contract”deficiencies.