摘要
对于冤错案件及时通过再审程序予以纠正是司法公正的必然要求,刑事申诉作为法院启动再审程序的材料来源,为权利人提请救济冤错案件提供了重要途径。但由于实践中申诉审查主体不中立,审查程序缺乏监督以及审查标准高导致申诉案件难以进入再审程序,申诉制度被虚置。因此,为保障申诉能够发挥其应有的作用,应当从引入异地审查模式、实行立案登记制、审查公开进行、保障律师的参与、降低再审启动标准五个方面对申诉的审查程序予以规制。
It is an inevitable requirement of judicial justice to correct the injustice and wrong case in time through the retrial procedure.As a source for the people’s court to initiate the retrial procedure,the criminal complaint provides an important way for the obligee to draw a remedy for the unjust case.However,due to the non-neutrality of the subject of review,the lack of supervision on the review procedure and the high standard of registration and retrial initiation,the cases are difficult to enter the retrial procedure and the complaint system is set aside.Therefore,In order to ensure the complaints play its due role,it should be regulated from the following five aspects:the introduction of off-site review mode,the implementation of registration system,the review of openness,the protection of lawyers’participation and the reduction of the standard of retrial.
作者
褚晓囡
CHU Xiao-nan(China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088)
出处
《浙江万里学院学报》
2018年第2期30-35,共6页
Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University
关键词
人民法院
申诉审查
审查主体
审查程序
审查标准
people’s court
the complaint review
the subject of review
the procedure of review
the standard of review