期刊文献+

VaR视角下基金系宝类产品与非宝类货基比较的实证分析

Empirical Analysis on Payment Funds and Common Monetary Funds Based on VaR
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自2013年余额宝推出后,基金公司也推出基金系宝类产品。通过选取规模靠前的8家基金公司的一只宝类产品与一只非基金系宝类产品进行比较。并选取样本基金2016年4季度至2017年3季度末相关数据,通过构建GARCH模型,计算比较样本基金的在险价值(VaR值),发现基金系宝类产品的收益波动风险要小于非宝类货基。 Since the introduction of Yu’e bao in 2013,fund managing companies also launched payment funds.This paper selects out of 8 fund managing companies one payment fund and one common monetary fund for comparison during the period from October 2016 to September 2017.Empirical studies revealed payment funds have less VaR by constructing GARCH models.
作者 傅凌燕 FU Ling-yan(Zhejiang Technical Institute of Economics,Hangzhou 310018,China)
出处 《科技和产业》 2018年第4期112-115,共4页 Science Technology and Industry
关键词 金融科技 宝类基金 在险价值 GARCH模型 fintech payment fund VaR GARCH model
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献26

  • 1张宁.开放式基金应成为我国证券投资基金的主导类型[J].海南金融,1999,0(7):33-35. 被引量:3
  • 2小詹姆斯 L 法雷尔 沃尔特 J 雷哈特 齐寅峰等译.《投资组合管理-理论及应用》:第二版[M].机械工业出版社,2000年..
  • 3Treynor, How to Rate Management Investment Funds. Harve Business Revtew, (43)1965, pp 63 - 75.
  • 4Sharpe- Mutual Fund Performance. Journal of Business, (39) 1966, pp 119 - 138.
  • 5Jensen, The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945 - 1964. Journal of Finance, (23) 1968, pp 389 - 416.
  • 6Eugene F Fama, Components of Investment Performance. Journal of Finance, (7) 1972, pp 551 - 567.
  • 7Treynor and Mazuy, Can Mutual Funds Outguess the Market? Harvard Business Review, (44)1966, pp 131 - 136.
  • 8Jensen, 1968, "The Performance of Mutual Funds in Lhe Period 1945-1964" ,Journal of Finance 23,389 - 416.
  • 9Sharpe,1966, "Mutual Fund Performance" , Journal of Business 39 ,119-138.
  • 10Treynor ,1965 , "How to Rate Management Investment Funds" ,Harvard Business Review 43,63 - 75.

共引文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部