期刊文献+

多排螺旋CT与MR在粥样硬化斑块和颈动脉狭窄中的诊断价值分析 被引量:4

Analysis of Multi-spiral CT and MR in Diagnosis of Atherosclerotic Plaque and Carotid Artery Stenosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察分析多排螺旋CT与MR在粥样硬化斑块和颈动脉狭窄中的诊断价值。方法随机选取该院2014年5月—2017年5月收治的40例脑血管缺血性疾病患者为该次实验研究对象,所有患者入院后均给予多排螺旋CT与MR检查,比较两组患者粥样硬化板块和颈动脉狭窄检出情况。结果 MR检查粥样硬化斑块检出率明显高于多排螺旋CT检查(80.4%vs 95.7%),MR检查颈动脉狭窄检出率明显高于CT检查(75.0%vs95.0%),两组数据差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于脑血管缺血性损伤患者给予多排螺旋CT检查可有效提高粥样硬化斑块检出率,对于判定粥样硬化斑块性质,了解个体颈动脉狭窄程度与MR检测相比具有明显优越性。 Objective To observe and analyze the value of multi-spiral CT and MR in diagnosis of atherosclerotic plaque and carotid artery stenosis.Methods 40 cases of patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease admitted and treated in our hospital from May 2014 to May 2017 were selected and examined by multi-spiral CT after admission,and the test situations of atherosclerotic plaque and carotid artery stenosis were compared.Results The detection rate of atherosclerotic plaques was significantly higher than that of multi-slice spiral CT(80.4%vs 95.7%)The test rate of MR in atherosclerotic plaque was obviously higher than that of CT examination(75.0%vs 95.0%),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The multi-spiral CT in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease can effectively improve the test rate of atherosclerotic plaque,which is better to determining the property of atherosclerotic plaque and knowing the carotid artery stenosis degree than MR test.
作者 方军 FANG Jun(Department of Radiology,Kunshan First People’s Hospital,Kunming,Yunnan Province,215300 China)
出处 《系统医学》 2017年第22期89-91,共3页 Systems Medicine
关键词 多排螺旋CT MR 粥样硬化斑块 颈动脉狭窄 诊断价值 Multi-spiral CT MR Atherosclerotic plaque Carotid artery stenosis Diagnosis value
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献87

  • 1李慎茂,凌锋,缪中荣,朱凤水,吉训明,李斗,王默力,华扬.颈动脉狭窄血管内支架治疗并发症的临床分析[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2005,2(2):56-61. 被引量:129
  • 2张峻,钱琦.CTA对颈动脉狭窄所致脑梗死的临床应用[J].浙江临床医学,2006,8(11):1145-1145. 被引量:7
  • 3Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, et al Carotid artery stenosis prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR and conventional angiography[J] Radiology, 2001,220(1) 179-185.
  • 4Kreatsoulas C, Anand SS. The impact of social determinants on cardiovascular disease[J]. Can J Cardiol, 2010,26(Suppl C): 8C-13C.
  • 5Calcagno C, Ramachandran S, Millon A, et al. Gadolinium- based contrast agents for vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of atherosclerosis [J]. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep, 2013,6(1):11-24.
  • 6Li W, Tutton S, Vu AT, et al. First-pass contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in humans using ferumoxytol, a novel uhrasmall superparamagnetie iron oxide (USP10)-based blood pool agent [J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2005,21 (1):46- 52.
  • 7Quist-Paulsen P. Statins and inflammation: an update [J]. Curr Opin Cardiol, 2010,25 (4) : 399-405.
  • 8Will O, Purkayastha S, Chan C, et al. Diagnostic precision of nanoparticle-enhanced MRI for lymph-node metastases: a meta- analysis [ J ]. Lancet Oncol, 2006,7 ( 1 ) : 52-60.
  • 9王焱辉,张兆琪,吕飙.64层螺旋CT检测冠状动脉粥样硬化斑块的初步研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(11):1189-1193. 被引量:18
  • 10Go A S, Mozaffarian D, Roger V L, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association [J]. Circulation, 2014, 129(3): e28.

共引文献108

同被引文献18

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部