期刊文献+

瘢痕子宫再次妊娠剖宫产与非瘢痕子宫剖宫产的临床效果分析 被引量:1

Clinical Analysis of Cesarean Section in Cesarean Section and Non-scar Uterine Cesarean Pregnancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨剖宫产手术用于瘢痕子宫再次妊娠患者与非瘢痕子宫患者临床效果的差异。方法将2016年7—12月期间该院收治的100例行剖宫产术患者纳入该次研究,按照子宫瘢痕情况将其分成瘢痕子宫组(n=50)和非瘢痕子宫组(n=50),对两组患者分别实施相应的剖宫产手术,观察其术中情况、术后情况、盆腔粘连情况、子宫状况及胎盘情况。结果瘢痕子宫组剖宫产患者接受手术治疗后的胎盘粘连发生率(16.00%)、术中出血量(205.79±38.34)mL、手术时间(50.20±11.70)min、产后出血量(410.00±138.75)mL、恶露持续时间(40.13±13.35)d与非瘢痕子宫组相比(4.00%)、(108.50±26.33)mL、(35.50±11.51)min、(250.00±50.56)mL、(26.67±9.17)d,数据对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论相较于非瘢痕子宫患者,瘢痕子宫再次妊娠患者实施剖宫产术的危险性较高,不良反应发生率明显提升。 Objective This paper tries to investigate the clinical effect of cesarean section in patients with scar uterine re-pregnancy and non-scar uterine.Methods 100 patients underwent cesarean section from July to December 2016 were included in this study.They were divided into scar uterine group(n=50)and non-scar uterine group(n=50)according to the situation of uterine scar.The corresponding cesarean section was performed on the two groups.The intraoperative condition,postoperative condition,pelvic adhesions,uterine condition and placenta were observed.Results The incidence of placental adhesions was 16.00%,intraoperative blood loss was(205.79±38.34)mL,operation time was(50.20±11.70)min,postpartum hemorrhage was(410.00±138.75)mL,lochia duration time was(40.13±13.35)d,and those in the non-scar uterine group were 4.00%,(108.50±26.33)mL and(35.50±11.51)min,(250.00±50.56)mL,(26.67±9.17)d,the data showed a significant difference(P<0.05),indicating a statistically significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with non-scar uterine patients,the risk of cesarean section was higher in patients with scarring uterine pregnancy and the incidence of adverse reactions was significantly improved.
作者 冯桂林 FENG Gui-lin(Department of Obstetrics,Jiangning Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Nanjing,Jiangsu Province,211100 China)
出处 《系统医学》 2017年第19期96-97,100,共3页 Systems Medicine
关键词 瘢痕子宫 再次妊娠 剖宫产 临床效果 Scar uterus Re-pregnancy Cesarean section Clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献50

  • 1杨祖菁.剖宫产后再次妊娠并发子宫破裂的早期诊断[J].实用妇产科杂志,2004,20(5):261-262. 被引量:85
  • 2傅才英,吴佩煜,翁霞云主编.妇产科手术学[M].第2版,北京:人民军医出版社,2003:320.
  • 3American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Vaginal birthafter previous cesarean[ J]. Obstet Gynecol,2004,104 :203-204.
  • 4Galyean AM,Lagrew DC,Bush MC,et al. Previous cesarean sectionand the risk of postpartum maternal complications and adverse neo-natal outcomes in future pregnancies[ J]. J Perinatol,2009,29( 11):726-730.
  • 5Olusanya BO, Solanke OA. Adverse neonatal outcomes associatedwith trial of labor after previous cesarean deliveryin an inner-city hos-pital in lagos,Nigeria[ J], Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2009,107 (2):135-139.
  • 6Makino S,Tanaka T,Itoh S,et al. Prospective comparison of deliveryoutcomes of vaginal birth after cesarean section versus laparoscopicmyomectomy[ J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res,2008,34(6) :952-956.
  • 7Guise JM,Mcdonagh MS,Osterweil P,et al. Systematic review of theincidence and consequences of uterine rupturein women with previouscaesarean section[ J]. BMJ,2004,329( 1) :19-25.
  • 8Sentilhes L,Vayssière C,Beucher G,et al.Delivery for women with a previous cesarean:guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians(CNGOF)[J].Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2013,170(1):25-32.
  • 9Kayem G,Raiffort C,Legardeur H,et al.Specific particularities of uterine scars and their impact on the risk of uterine rupture in case of trial of labor[J].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod(Paris),2012,41(8):753-771.
  • 10Homer CS,Besley K,Bell J,et al.Does continuity of care impact decision making in the next birth after a caesarean section(VBAC)?a randomised controlled trial[J].BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2013,(13):140.

共引文献149

同被引文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部