期刊文献+

物质点方法与有限元方法在二维接触问题中的对比

Comparision Between Finite Element Method and Material Point Method Over 2D Contact Problem
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对非线性力学问题,特别是接触类问题时,有限元法经常暴露出时间成本高,计算结果不容易收敛等先天性缺陷。相比之下,物质点法具有更好的性质,接触应力由物质点之间的动量守恒直接计算得到,理论上计算开销更小,同时具备更高的计算精度和准确度。本文采用物质点方法、有限元法和解析方法对赫兹接触问题进行求解,并将三种方法计算得到的最大接触应力进行比较。计算分析后发现,相比有限元法,物质点法的计算结果的精确度与准确度略高。本文的分析研究为计算接触问题提供了新的思路,具备一定工程应用价值。 For nonlinear mechanical problems,especially the contact problems,the finite element method often exposes the high time cost,and the calculation results are not easy to converge and other congenital defects.In contrast,the material point method has better properties.The contact stress is directly calculated from the momentum conservation between material points,which has less computational cost and higher accuracy.In this paper,the material point method,finite element method and analytical method are used to solve the Hertz contact problem,and the maximum contact stress calculated by the three methods is compared.The calculation results show that compared with the finite element method,the accuracy of the material point method is slightly higher.The analysis and study of this paper provides a new way of thinking for the calculation of contact problems,and has a certain value of engineering application.
作者 卢嘉铮 姚星宇 LU Jia-zheng;YAO Xing-yu(Aviation Engineering Institute,Civil Aviation Flight University of China,Guanghan,Guanghan Sichuan 618300,China)
出处 《科技视界》 2018年第5期12-14,83,共4页 Science & Technology Vision
基金 "考虑连接阻尼的航空发动机螺栓连接结构改进薄层单元法研究"(BJ2016-03)
关键词 物质点法 有限元法 赫兹接触 Material point method Finite element method Hertz contact problem
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献148

  • 1王津龙,刘天云,张楚汉.堆石体柱状试件成型过程的材料点法仿真[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(12):1604-1607. 被引量:4
  • 2郑勇刚,顾元宪,陈震.薄膜破坏过程数值模拟的MPM方法[J].力学学报,2006,38(3):347-355. 被引量:5
  • 3马上,张雄,邱信明.超高速碰撞问题的三维物质点法[J].爆炸与冲击,2006,26(3):273-278. 被引量:23
  • 4王宇新,陈震,孙明.滑移爆轰问题无网格MPM法数值模拟[J].力学与实践,2007,29(3):20-25. 被引量:9
  • 5Ambati R, Pan X F, Yuan H. 2012. Application of material point method for cutting process simulations. Computa- tional Materials Science, 57:102-110.
  • 6Andersen S, Andersen L. 2010. Modelling of landslides with the materiM-point method. Computational Geosciences, 14: 137-147.
  • 7Anvar G, Sumanta A. 2008. A hybrid immersed bound- ary and material point method for simulating 3d fluid- structure interaction problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 56:2151-2177.
  • 8Ayton G, Bardenhagen S G, McMurtry P, et al. 2001. Interfacing continuum and molecular dynamics: An ap- plication to lipid bilayers. Journal of Chemical Physics, 114 (15): 6913-6924.
  • 9Bardenhagen S G, Brackbill J U, Sulsky D. 2000. The material-point method for granular materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 187 (3- 4): 529-541.
  • 10Bardenhagen S G, Brydon A D, Guilkey J E. 2005. Insight into the physics of foam densification via numerical sim- ulation. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 53 (3): 597-617.

共引文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部