关学史叙事演变:以关学道统讨论为中心

The Discussion on Orthodoxy of Guanxue in the Narration of Guanxue History

自冯从吾《关学编》开关学史撰写先河,王心敬、李元春、贺瑞麟补续其后,兼以柏景伟、刘古愚、张元勋等人的探讨,围绕着关学道统问题,形成了以张载为始祖和以伏羲为始祖的两条路径。虽然以张载为始祖的道统成为主流,影响更大,但以伏羲为始祖的道统并非简单的托古自重,而是有其理论,丰富了关学的内涵,不失为对关学史及其道统的积极探讨。两条路径虽然在道统的起源上存在分歧,但对于自宋以降直到清末民初的关学道统构建却高度一致,实现了殊途同归。

Since the compilation of Guanxue Bian by Feng Congwu,continuation by Wang Xinjing,Li Yuanchun,and He Ruilin,and discussion by Bai Jingwei,Liu Guyu,and Zhang Yuanxun,there have been two paths revolving around Guanxue orthodoxy,namely with Zhang Zai and Fuxi as the first ancestor separately.The orthodoxy based on Zhang Zai was much more popular,but another one had its theoretical meanings.Although they had disputes in the origin of orthodoxy,they were highly consistent in Guanxue orthodoxy construction in the period from the Song Dynasty to the early years of the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China.