期刊文献+

非专利实施体标准必要专利诉讼中禁令的适用原则 被引量:2

Applicable Principles of Injunction in the Case of Standard-Essential Patents by Non-Practicing Entity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着高新产业的发展与专利标准化的普及,越来越多非专利实施体请求法院向标准必要专利侵权人颁发禁令。目前,各国法院对禁令的适用原则不一致,主要适用衡平法原则、FRAND原则和过错责任原则。学界则多从反垄断法与反不正当竞争法视角论述,对象相对单一。禁令适用标准成为最近饱受争议的话题,而禁令制度影响着企业的发展和技术的革新,因此法院在适用禁令时当以善意原则、FRAND前置原则、利益平衡原则及禁令最后救济原则进行综合考察。 With the rapid development of high-tech industries and the prevalence of Standard-essential Patents,an increasing number of Non-Practicing Entities are seeking an injunction against infringer in the court.Applicable principles of injunctive relief include balancing of interests,FRAND and the principle of fault liability among different courts.In the academic circle,the principles are mostly in the view of the Anti-monopoly Law and Anti-unfair Competition Act.Since the standard of injunctive relief becomes a contentious issue in the world,which affects the development of enterprises and technology,it is of importance for courts to adopt the applicable principles of injunctive relief including good faith,FRAND,balancing of interests and final injunctive relief.
作者 何丹 HE Dan(Fuzhou University Law School,Fuzhou,Fujian 350000,China)
机构地区 福州大学法学院
出处 《时代法学》 2018年第2期113-121,共9页 Presentday Law Science
关键词 标准必要专利 禁令 非专利实施体 FRAND原则 专利侵权 Standard-essential Patents injunction Non-Practicing Entity FRAND infringement
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献67

  • 1郑成思.侵害知识产权的无过错责任[J].中国法学,1998(1):81-90. 被引量:101
  • 2吴永臻.网络信息环境的知识产权保护问题[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1998,23(2):137-143. 被引量:18
  • 3孔祥俊.论侵权行为的归责原则[J].中国法学,1992(5):70-77. 被引量:60
  • 4R.F.沃尔,杰里米.菲利普斯,王捷.版权与现代技术[J].国外法学,1984(6):17-21. 被引量:29
  • 5国家知识产权局.国家知识产权局专利业务工作及综合管理统计月报[EB/OL].http://www.sipo.gov.cn/ghfzs/zhj/Oyb/2013/201306/dO130617_803288. html, 2013 -06 -17 / 2013 -06 -25.
  • 6郑成思.知识产权论[M]法律出版社,2001.
  • 7FTC seeks to examine patent assertion entities and their impact on innovation,competition[EB/OL] .[2013-09-27] .http://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2013/09/ftcseeks-examine-patent-assertion-entities-their-impact.
  • 8E.S.K.Ng.Patent trolling:innovation at risk[J] .European Intellectual Property Review,2009,31(12):593-608.
  • 9Mark A.Lemley.Missing the forest for the trolls[EB/OL] .[2013-03-23] .http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2269087.
  • 10Jonathan H.Ashtor,Michael J.Mazzeo,Samantha Zyontz.Patents at issue:the data behind the patent troll debate[EB/OL] .[2014-08-08] .http://www.law.northwestern.edu/research-faculty/searlecenter/innovationeconomics/documents/Mazzeo_Zyontz_Ashtor_patents_at_issue.pdf.

共引文献273

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部