期刊文献+

临床实践指南制定方法——指南范围、主题及问题的确定 被引量:14

Methodology for clinical practice guidelines——identifying and forming the scope,topic and clinical question
下载PDF
导出
摘要 指南主题的确定是指南构建的首要步骤,合理规范的指南主题是构建临床需要的指南和保证指南如期完成的重要条件。此过程中常常需要确定范围、主题或议题、问题三类。范围与主题较宏观,问题更具体和明确,临床问题是制定文献检索与系统评价并最终形成推荐意见的基础。范围和主题的确定有多项原则,比如:邀请利益相关方进行讨论确定;优先制定严重疾病负担、临床实践变异大、文献基础较好的主题。临床问题的确定依据PICO模式。 Only when the scope is well defined will it be possible to develop guideline meeting the clinical requirement,assess the workload and timescale of the guideline development process.Scope and topic involve considering in detail the areas of clinical practice that will be addressed by the guideline.There are some key principals:inviting the coordinators of all interest groups or stakeholders to propose and discuss new guideline topics;giving priority on topics with high costs,major patient impact;high practice variation.The questions listed in the scope or topic need to be translated into review questions for developing review questions and planning the evidence review.Clinical questions should be more clear and focused.A helpful framework to format key questions systematically is the PICO framework.
作者 靳英辉 韩斐 王强 王行环 Jin Yinghui;Han Fei;Wang Qiang;Wang Xinghuan(Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine,Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University;Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine,Wuhan University;Department of Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology,The Second Clinical College,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430071,China.)
出处 《中国循证心血管医学杂志》 2018年第3期257-261,共5页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Cardiovascular Medicine
基金 国家卫生计生委委托课题(医管办函[2018]9号) 国家重点研发计划专项基金(2016YFC0106300) 湖北省卫生和计划生育委员会联合基金项目(WJ2018H0009)
关键词 指南 手册 范围 主题 问题 Guideline Handbook Scope Topic Question
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献19

  • 1Field M, Lohr K. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Washington, DC: National Academic Press; 1990.
  • 2Schunemann HJ, Woodhead M, Anzueto A, et al. A vision statement on guideline development for respiratory disease: the example of COPD. Lancet, 2009, 373: 774-779.
  • 3Guyatt G, Vist G, Falck-Ytter Y, et al. An emerging consensus on grading recommendations? ACP J Club, 2006, 144(1): A8-9.
  • 4Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336: 1170-1173.
  • 5Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336: 924-926.
  • 6Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ, 2008, 336: 995-998.
  • 7Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336:1049-1051.
  • 8Schunemann HI, Oxman AD, Brozek l, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ, 2008, 336:1106-1110.
  • 9Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Dellinger P, et al. Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive. BMJ, 2008, 337: a744.
  • 10Brozek J, Oxman A, Scheunemann HJ. GRADEpro. [Computer program].Version 3.2 for Windows. Available at http://mcmaster. flintbox.com/technology.asp?Page53993 and http://www.cc-ims.net/ revman/gradepro. Accessed October 21, 2010.

共引文献270

同被引文献166

引证文献14

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部