期刊文献+

基于有序逻辑回归的标准必要专利价值影响因素研究 被引量:5

Research of the Influencing Factors on the Standard Essential Patent's Value Based on the Ordered Logistic Regression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以信息通信技术领域中第三代移动通信技术标准UMTS专利(包括涉诉专利和非涉诉专利)为研究对象,运用因子分析法进行标准必要专利价值评估,将影响标准必要专利价值的因素分为技术价值和战略价值两个维度,进而运用有序逻辑回归研究技术价值和战略价值对必要专利价值的影响。结果表明:(1)涉诉标准必要专利的价值比非涉诉标准必要专利的价值更高;(2)技术价值和战略价值都是影响标准必要专利价值的因素,且战略价值对其价值的影响更大。 This paper takes the patents of UMTS as the researching objects,which are the third-generation mobile communication technical standard in the field of information and communication technologies,including the litigation standard essential patents(SEPs)and non-litigation ones.The factor analysis method is used to determine the SEP’s value,and the influencing factors on SEPs are devided into the technical value and strategic value.Then the ordered logistic regression is used to identify the influence of the technical factor and strategic factor on SEPs.The results show that:(1)the value of litigation SEPs are higher than the value of the non-litigation SEPs;(2)the influencing factors on SEP’s value can be devided into the technical value and strategic value,and the value of the strategic value is more important.
作者 张俊艳 余敏 ZHANG Jun-yan;YU Min(Tianjin University Tianjin 300072 China)
机构地区 天津大学
出处 《电子科技大学学报(社科版)》 2018年第1期15-19,共5页 Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 2016年国家自然科学基金项目"标准必要专利的形成机理及其FRAND许可定价研究"(71572127)
关键词 有序逻辑回归 标准必要专利 价值评估 UMTS技术标准 ordered logistic regression standard essential patent value evaluation UMTS
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献35

  • 1生延超.基于改进的Shapley值法的技术联盟企业利益分配[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2009,30(2):34-39. 被引量:34
  • 2戴建华,薛恒新.基于Shapley值法的动态联盟伙伴企业利益分配策略[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(4):33-36. 被引量:232
  • 3杜颖梅:《知识产权成长三角新一轮博弈焦点》,载《江苏经济报》,http..//jsjjb.xhby.ne~html/2013-(M/24/content_757328.htm,最后访问日期:2013年5月7日.
  • 4Pakes A. and Schankerman M. The Rate of Obsolescence of Patents, Research Gestation Lags, and the Private Rate of Return to Research Resources. In: R&D, Patents and Productivity, Griliches Z. (Ed.), the University of Chicago Press, (1984): 98-112.
  • 5Moore K.A. Worthless Patents. George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 04-29, 2005.
  • 6Putnam J. The Value of International Patent Rights. Ph.D. Thesis, Yale University, 1996.
  • 7Sapsalis, van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie and Ran Navon. Academic versus Industry Patenting: An In-Depth Analysis of What Determines Patent Value. Research Policy, 2006, 35(10): 1631-1645.
  • 8Tong X. and Frame J.D. Measuring National Technological Performance with Patent Claims Data. Research Policy, 1992, 23: 133-141.
  • 9Schettino F. Sterlacchini A. and Venturini F. Inventive Productivity and Patent Quality: Evidence from Italian Inventors. MPRA Paper No. 7872, 2008.
  • 10Karki M.M.S. and Krishnan K.S. Patent Citation Analysis: A Policy Analysis Tool[J]. World Patent Information, 1997, 19(4):269-272.

共引文献46

同被引文献83

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部