期刊文献+

儿童类包含概念与归纳推理多样性效应的关系

Relationship between Children Concept of Class Inclusion and Diversity Effects in Inductive Reasoning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用经典类包含任务以及寻找证据法、属性扩展法和归属法的归纳推理任务,进行了三个相关性研究,共测查儿童120名。结果显示7、8岁儿童类包含概念成绩与其在寻找证据任务和属性扩展任务中的归纳推理多样性表现之间存在显著正相关(r=0.34,0.29;P<0.05)。然而,7、8岁儿童类包含概念成绩与其在归属任务中归纳推理多样性表现不存在显著相关(r=0.18,P>0.05)。儿童在归属法任务中表现出来的归纳推理多样性效应与在寻找证据法和属性扩展法中表现出来的归纳推理多样性效应可能是不同质的。 There were three correlational studies.200 children medical were tested with class concept reasoning task and inductive reasoning tasks including search for evidence,attribute extension and attribution.The results are as follows:there was a significant positive correlation between the scores of class concept reasoning task and search for evidence or attribute extension inductive reasoning task in 7 and 8 years old children(r=0.34,0.29;P<0.05);however,there was no significant correlation between he scores of class concept reasoning task and attribution inductive reasoning task in 7 and 8 years old children(r=0.18,P>0.05).The diversity effects in inductive reasoning that children show in the task of attribution is likely to be different from that in the search for evidence and attribute extension.
作者 刘娟 周玲 LIU Juan;ZHOU Lin(School of Education Science,Zhaotong University,Zhaotong,657000,China)
出处 《陕西学前师范学院学报》 2018年第4期9-13,共5页 Journal of Shaanxi Xueqian Normal University
关键词 归纳推理 多样性效应 类包含 儿童 inductive reasoning diversity effects class inclusion children
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献160

  • 1李红,陈安涛,冯廷勇,李富洪,龙长权.个体归纳推理能力的发展及其机制研究展望[J].心理科学,2004,27(6):1457-1459. 被引量:30
  • 2陈安涛,李红,冯廷勇,高雪梅,张仲明,李富洪,杨东.分段设计条件下归纳推理的多样性效应[J].中国科学(C辑),2005,35(3):275-283. 被引量:13
  • 3李富洪,李红,陈安涛,冯廷勇,龙长权.归纳推理的多样性效应及其机制探索[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(3):360-367. 被引量:16
  • 4培根.新工具[M].北京:商务印书馆,1984..
  • 5Bailenson, J. N., Shum, M. S., Atran, S., Medin, D. L., & Coley, J. D. (2002). A bird's eye view: biological categorization and reasoning within and across cultures. Cognition, 84, 1-53.
  • 6Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books. Choi, L, Nisbett, R. E, & Snuth, E. E. (1997). Culture, category salience, and inductive reasoning. Cognition, 65, 15-32.
  • 7Coley, J. D., Medin, D. L., Proffitt, J. B., Lynch, E., & Atran, S. (1999). Inductive reasoning in folkbiological thought. In D. L. Mediu & S. Atran (Eds.), Folk biology (pp. 205-232). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • 8Gelman, S. A. & Markman, E. M. (1986). Categories and induction in young children. Cognition, 23, 183-209.
  • 9Gelman, S. A. (1988). The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 65-95.
  • 10Gutheil, G. & Gelman, S. A. (1997). Children's use of sample size and diversity information within basic-level categories. Journal of experimental child psychology, 64, 159-174.

共引文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部