期刊文献+

冷刀锥切术在绝经后妇女宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅲ级诊治中的应用 被引量:14

Application of cold knife conization in the diagnosis and treatment of CIN Ⅲ in postmenopausal women
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的讨论冷刀锥切在绝经后妇女宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)Ⅲ级诊治中的效果。方法回顾性分析因CINⅢ行冷刀锥切的患者259例,分为绝经组78例,未绝经组181例,将阴道镜活检与锥切术后病理以及再次手术后的病理进行比较。结果阴道镜活检病理结果与宫颈冷刀锥切术后病理相符率比较:绝经组相符率为66.66%,未绝经组相符率为70.16%;切缘情况比较:绝经组切缘阳性率为14.10%,未绝经组切缘阳性率为10.49%;追加手术后病灶残留率比较:绝经组残留率为10.25%,未绝经组残留率为8.33%。两组比较均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论冷刀锥切适用于绝经后妇女CINⅢ级,可避免漏诊和过度治疗,对于想保留子宫的绝经后患者是首选方法。 Objective To investigate the effect of cervical cold knife conization in postmenopausal women with CINⅢ.Methods A retrospective analysis was made of 259 cases of CINⅢ,including 78 postmenopausal women and 181 premenopausal women,who were treated with cervical cold knife conization.The biopsy under colposcopy,postoperative pathology and the extent of surgery were compared.Results The agreement rate between the colposcopy biopsy and the cervical cold knife conization pathology was 66.66%in postmenopausal group,while 70.16%in the premenopausal group.The positive margin rate of the postmenopausal group was 14.10%,while the rate of the premenopausal group was 10.49%.The additional postoperative residual positive rate of the postmenopausal group was 10.25%,while the rate of the premenopausal group was 8.33%.And the difference was not significant(P>0.05).Conclusions Cold knife conization is suitable for postmenopausal women with CINⅢ,which can avoid missed diagnosis and over treatment,and is the firstpreferred method for postmenopausal patients who want to retain their uterus.
作者 李玉娟 谢静燕 LI Yujuan;XIE Jingyan(Department of Gynecology,The First Hospital of Nanjing,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210006,China)
出处 《安徽医药》 CAS 2018年第5期918-920,共3页 Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 冷刀锥切 宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅲ 绝经后 cold knife conization CINⅢ postmenopause
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献99

  • 1彭莉,姚吉龙,徐波,覃春容.高级别CIN宫颈锥切术后切缘残留47例临床分析[J].肿瘤预防与治疗,2009,22(1):49-51. 被引量:8
  • 2戴志琴,潘凌亚,黄惠芳,郎景和.宫颈上皮内瘤变手术后边缘的评价[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2007,29(2):153-154. 被引量:10
  • 3钱德英.重视宫颈癌前病变筛查的质量管理控制[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2007,23(7):497-498. 被引量:102
  • 4Kyrgiou M, Tsoumpou I, Vrekoussis T, et al. The up-to-date evidence on colposcopy practice and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the Cochrane calposcopy & cervical cytopathology collaborative group ( C5 group ) approach. Cancer Treat Rev .2006.32,516-523.
  • 5Wright TC Jr, Massad LS, Dunton C J, et al. 2006 consensus uidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 197:340-345.
  • 6Benedet JL, Bender H, Jones H 3rd, et al. FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic carcinomas. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2000,70:209-262.
  • 7Ghaem-Maghami S, Sagi S, Majeed G, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of treatment failure : a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol, 2007, 8 : 985-993.
  • 8薛风霞.宫颈炎症//乐杰.妇产科学.6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:264-267.
  • 9Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet ,2006,367:489-498.
  • 10Bruinsma F, Lumley J, Tan J, et al. Precancerous changes in the cervix and risk of subsequent preterm biah. BJOG ,2007 ,114 :70-80.

共引文献166

同被引文献94

引证文献14

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部