期刊文献+

替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对急性心肌梗死患者行急诊PCI的临床效果和安全性对比 被引量:20

Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety of emergency treatment with ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing emergency PCI
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者急诊行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)时的临床疗效和安全性。方法选择2015年6月至2017年2月该科收治的急诊行PCI的AMI患者182例,分为观察组91例和对照组91例。观察组术前及术后1周使用阿司匹林联合替格瑞洛进行治疗,术后1周后改为阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷;对照组术前及术后均给予阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷治疗。比较两组患者术前、术后的TIMI血流分级、TMPG心肌灌注分级,以及术前、术后1周内患者的左室射血分数(LVEF)、左室舒张末径(LVEDD)、血小板聚集率,记录6个月随访中所有患者主要心血管不良事件(MACE)及出血事件发生情况。结果经过PCI,两组患者的TIMI及TMPG分级均显著改善,同时术后观察组TIMI分级明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后两组患者的LVEF均明显升高,而LVEDD及血小板聚集率均显著降低,且术后观察组患者的LVEF、LVEDD、血小板聚集率均明显优于对照组患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后6个月内MACE发生率显著低于对照组患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而两组患者的出血事件发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对于急诊行PCI治疗的AMI患者,替格瑞洛比氯吡格雷疗效更佳,能够迅速恢复患者心肌灌注,对血小板聚集抑制作用更明显,有效降低MACE,提高预后,不增加出血风险,临床效果及安全性良好,值得临床推广。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in emergency patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention.Methods During the period of June 2015 to February 2017,182 cases of AMI with PCI admitted to the emergency department of our hospital,according to the random number table method,all patients were divided into observation group 91 cases and control group 91 cases,the patients in the observation group were treated with aspirin and Grillo for one week before and after the operation,and Clopidogrel would be replaced with clopidogrel one week after surgery,the patients in the control group were treated with aspirin and clopidogrel before and after the operation.The TIMI blood flow classification,TMPG myocardial perfusion classification,and left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF),left ventricular end diastolic diameter(LVEDD)and platelet aggregation rate were compared between the two groups before and after operation,and the myocardial perfusion classification was performed preoperatively and postoperatively,The major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE)and bleeding events were recorded in all patients at 6 months of follow-up.Results After PCI,TIMI and TMPG grade of the two groups were significantly improved,and postoperative TIMI grade were significantly better than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);after two groups of patients with LVEF were significantly increased,while LVEDD and platelet aggregation rate were significantly decreased,and the postoperative observation with LVEF,LVEDD,platelet aggregation rate were significantly better than the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05);the incidence of major cardiovascular events was significantly lower than the control group of patients within 6 months of the patients in the observation group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05),and the two groups of patients with bleeding events the total incidence rate comparison,the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion Ticagrelor for emergency PCI treatment of AMI patients with better curative effect than clopidogrel,it can significantly improve myocardial perfusion,inhibit platelet aggregation more obviously,significantly reduce MACE,improve prognosis,without increasing the risk of bleeding.The clinical effect and safety are good.It is worthy of clinical promotion.
作者 王宇 WANG Yu(Department of Emergency,Zunhua People′s Hospital of Hebei,Zunhua,Hebei 064200,China)
出处 《检验医学与临床》 CAS 2018年第8期1128-1131,共4页 Laboratory Medicine and Clinic
关键词 急性心肌梗死 经皮冠状动脉介入 替格瑞洛 氯吡格雷 acute myocardial infarction percutaneous coronary intervention ticagrelor clopidogrel
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献106

  • 1韩莹,冯力,李明星,胡永毅,冯涛.替格瑞洛对冠心病血小板药物抵抗患者的治疗作用[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(9):2393-2394. 被引量:13
  • 2王同汉,刘映峰,李志梁,魏向龙,石向东.急性心肌梗死伴心衰、心源性休克病人经皮冠状动脉介入治疗近中期疗效[J].第一军医大学学报,2005,25(8):1064-1066. 被引量:8
  • 3朱建国,杨新春,王树岩,陈瑾,那开宪.心肌梗死后患者再发心梗的临床分析[J].中国医刊,2007,42(7):58-59. 被引量:5
  • 4李锦丽,闫亚娟.再发性心肌梗死临床观察[J].中国误诊学杂志,2007,7(6):1213-1214. 被引量:1
  • 5Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med, 2009,361 : 1045-1057.
  • 6Cannon CP, Harrington RA, James S, et al. Comparison of ticagrelor with clopidogrel inpatients with a planned invasive strategy for acute coronary syndromes (PLATO):a Randomised double blind study. Lancet,2010,375:283-293.
  • 7Storey RF. Pharmacology and clinical trials of reversibly-binding P2Y12 inhibitors. Thromb Haemost, 2011,105 : S75-81.
  • 8Cannon CP, Husted S, Harrington RA, et al. Safety, tolerability,and initial efficacy of AZD6140, the first reversible oraladenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist, compared with clopidogrel, in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: primary results of the DISPERSE-2 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,50:1844-1851.
  • 9杨晓伟,张君毅,易甫,等.替格瑞洛对急性冠状动脉综合征择期介入治疗患者近中期疗效观察[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2013,7(19):8696-8700.
  • 10Yusuf S,Zhao F,Mehta SR,et al.Effects of clopidogrel in addition of aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation[J].New Engl J Med,2001,345(7):494-502.

共引文献5333

同被引文献153

引证文献20

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部