期刊文献+

审查逮捕主体司法化研究 被引量:1

Judicialization of Reviewing Arrest's Subject
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国立法规定了审查逮捕的主体只有检察院,通过对中立性的应然状态与实然状态进行对比分析,发现这一规定存在不合理性:检察机关作为被告人的对立方是无法对逮捕进行中立性审查,而法院作为独立于双方当事人的第三方中立主体才能进行居中审查,才能使得审查逮捕程序司法化。在分析了法院作为审查逮捕主体的合理性之后,最关键在于如何将这一制度在立法中确立。应当考虑组织机构、管辖、回避、救济制度等相关措施,从而进一步完善审查逮捕程序。 China's legislation stipulates that the sole subject of examination and arrest is the procuratorate.By comparing and analyzing the state of theory and reality of neutrality,the author finds that this regulation is unreasonable.The reason is that the procuratorial,as the opposite side of defendant,could not censor the arrest neutrally.However,court,as the neutral third party,could censor the arrest neutrally.Only in this can reviewing arrest be judicative.After analyzing the reasonableness of the court as the subject of the reviewing arrest,the author thinks that the key is howto establish this systemin legislation.We should consider the related measures such as organization,jurisdiction,avoidance and relieving system.We can further improve the review of arrest procedures.
作者 逯凡 LU Fan(School of Law,University of International Relations,Beijing 100091,China)
出处 《遵义师范学院学报》 2018年第2期62-67,共6页 Journal of Zunyi Normal University
关键词 立法现状 应然状态 实然状态 中立性审查 立法体现 present situation of legislation the state of theory the state of reality reviving neutrality embodiment in legislation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献41

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部