对比急诊护理路径与传统护理对急性心肌梗死的抢救效果

Effective comparison of emergency nursing path and traditional nursing on acute myocardial infarction

目的:分析研讨急性护理路径与传统护理对急性心肌梗死的抢救效果。方法:用1︰1随机数字法分两组讨论,我院2015年12月-2017年6月期间收治的急性心肌梗死患者80例,对照组40例接受传统护理,研究组40例接受急性护理路径,观察两组患者护理状况,如抢救效果、住院时间、卧床时间等,并比较。结果:研究组急救时间、分诊评估时间、急诊停留时间、卧床时间、球囊扩张时间、住院时间均低于对照组,且P<0.05。结论:建议将急诊护理路径应用于急性心肌梗死患者抢救过程中,可明显提升抢救效率,缩短住院时间,促进康复,值得应用。

Objective:To analyze and compare the effect of emergency nursing path and traditional nursing on acute myocardial infarction.Methods:80 patients with acute myocardial infarction treated in our hospital from December 2015 to June 2017 were randomly divided into two groups.40 cases in the control group received traditional nursing and 40 cases in the study group received emergency nursing path.The nursing status of two groups,such as rescue effect,hospital stay,bed rest time,etc.were observed and compared.Results:The first aid time,the evaluation time,the emergency stay time,the bed time,the time of the balloon dilation and the hospitalization time in the study group were shorter than those in the control group,P<0.05.Conclusion:It was suggested that emergency nursing path was applied to the rescue of patients with acute myocardial infarction,which could significantly improve the rescue efficiency,shorten the hospitalization time and promote rehabilitation.