期刊文献+

参照性交流学习过程中语言信息量的特点

The Characteristics of Language Information in the Process of Referential Communication
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究以大学生为被试,创设虚拟学习材料,采用参照性交流学习范式,通过功能预测任务和维度选择任务,比较探查参照性交流学习过程中语言信息量的特点。结果发现:参照性交流过程中,有关信息和无关信息均表现出显著性变化;两个任务中有关信息无显著差异;维度选择任务中的无关信息显著少于功能预测任务的学习阶段10。结果证实:随着学习进程的发展,参照性交流语言中的有关信息在学习后期表现出相对过少的特点;从任务间比较的角度,参照性交流语言中"无关信息"相对过多。 The research took college students as subjects and designed the virtual learning materials.It created the paradigm of referential communication to explore the characteristics of language information by the tasks of functional prediction and dimensional selection.The results showed that:The relevant information and irrelevant information showed significant changes in the referential communication process;The relevant information did not show significant difference between two tasks;The irrelevant information in the dimension selection was significantly less than block10.The results proved:The relevant information in communication language in the late stage of learning was relatively less;The irrelevant information was relatively too much by comparison between the tasks.
作者 张恒超 ZHANG Hengchao(Department of Psychology,School of Law,Tianjin University of Commerce,Tianjin 300134,China)
出处 《心理技术与应用》 2018年第5期274-283,共10页 Psychology(Techniques and Applications)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(16YJC190029)
关键词 参照性交流 学习 语言 信息量 referential communication learning language quantity of information
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献61

  • 1沈德立,白学军.高效率学习的心理机制研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(1):2-6. 被引量:83
  • 2Araban, S. , Zainalipour, H. , Saadi, R. H. R., Javdan, M. , Sezide, K. , & Sajjadi, S. (2012). Study of cooperative learning effects on self-efficacy and academic achievement in English lesson of high school students. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2 (9), 8524 - 8526.
  • 3Arnold, ]. E. , Tanenhaus, M. K. , Altmann, R. J. , & Fagnano, M. (2004). The old and thee, uh, new. Psychological Science, 15, 578 -582.
  • 4Bangerter, A. , & Clark, H. H. (2003). Navigating joint projects with dialogue. Cognitive Science, 27 (2) , 195 - 225.
  • 5Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2002). Anchoring comprehension in linguistic precedents. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 391 -418.
  • 6Bezuidenhout, A. (2012). Perspective taking in conversation: A defense of speaker non-egocentricity. Journal of Pragmatics, in press.
  • 7B6gels, S., Schriefers, H., Vonk, W., & Chwilla, D. J. (2011). Pitch accents in context: How listeners process accentuation in referential communication. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2022 -2036.
  • 8Branigan, H. P., Pit'kering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75(2), B13 -B25.
  • 9Brenuan, S. E. , Chen, X., Dickinson, C. A. , Neider, M. B. , & Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). Coordinating cognition: The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search. Cognitior, 106 (3), 1465 - 1477.
  • 10Brennan, S. E. , & Hanna, J. E. (2009). Partner-specific adaptation in dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 274 -291.

共引文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部