期刊文献+

由外伤后主动脉夹层形成的伤病关系鉴定之探析 被引量:6

Analysis on Injury-disease Relationship Appraisal of Trauma Aortic Dissection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章通过回顾性分析8例外伤后主动脉夹层的伤病关系鉴定,发现类似情况下鉴定差异较大,临床法医学鉴定界对这一领域缺少统一认识;认为目前比较全面、客观、科学的鉴定思路,应从年龄、胸部外伤强度、主动脉夹层危险因素三个方面进行分析,由此可得出比较全面的伤病关系及伤病比。 Through retrospective analysis on 8 cases of injury-disease relationship appraisal of trauma aortic dis?section in this paper,it is found that in similar situation,the appraisal difference is great,and there is a lack of uni?fied understanding in this field in clinical forensic science.This paper argues that if the analysis is made from the as?pects of age,strength of chest trauma,aortic dissection risk factors,comprehensive injury-disease relationship and injury ratio can be obtained,which is a more comprehensive,objective and scientific appraisal idea at present.
作者 顾晓峰 Gu Xiaofeng
出处 《医学与法学》 2018年第2期59-65,共7页 Medicine and Jurisprudence
关键词 主动脉夹层 危险因素 伤病关系 法医学鉴定 aortic dissection risk factor injury-disease relationship forensic appraisal
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献48

  • 1褚晓波.主动脉夹层33例临床诊治分析[J].中华危重病急救医学,2008,20(12). 被引量:16
  • 2秦小奎,刘晓方.113例主动脉夹层的危险因素报告及文献综合分析[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(6):527-529. 被引量:69
  • 3孙惠萍,李晓梅,王朝霞,江洁,王坤,买苏木.马合木提.主动脉夹层临床特点对比分析[J].新疆医科大学学报,2006,29(7):602-603. 被引量:3
  • 4朱广友,主编.法医临床司法鉴定实务[M].北京:法律出版社,2008,350-355.
  • 5吴在德 吴肇汉.外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003,8.900.
  • 6Crawford ES. The diagnosis and management of aortic dissection. JAMA,1990,264:2537-2541.
  • 7Prete R,v Segesser LK. Aortic dissection. Lancet,1997,349:1461-1464.
  • 8吴在德,吴肇汉.外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:475.
  • 9Auer J, Berent R, Eher B. Aortic dissection: incidence, natural history and impact of surgery. [J].J Clin Basic Cardiol, 2000,3 (3) :151-154.
  • 10Christoph A, Nienaherm G. Diabetes mellitus and thoracic aortic disease: are people with diabetes Mellitus protected from acute aor- tic dissection? [J]. JAHA,2012,1(3) :1-2.

共引文献98

同被引文献35

引证文献6

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部