期刊文献+

应用诊断准确性研究报告规范(STARD 2015)提高论文报告质量 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 诊断准确性研究是用来评估某试验方法,正确地将一组研究对象区分为具有或不具有某种状况能力的研究。既往因诊断准确性研究论文撰写无统一的规范指导,导致报告遗漏了部分重要的研究信息,削弱了研究结果的应用价值,阻碍了其传播和应用。为提高诊断性研究报告的质量,“诊断准确性研究报告标准(Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy,STARD)”于2003年发表,2015年该专家组对部分条目作了更新,发表了新的STARD声明[1]。遗憾的是,国内目前尚无学术杂志规定投稿的诊断准确性论文需要遵循STARD报告规范,也少有作者在其论文中说明遵循了STARD规范。本文旨在推广和普及STARD报告规范,以提升诊断准确性研究论文的报告质量。
出处 《山西医药杂志》 CAS 2018年第8期883-885,共3页 Shanxi Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy[J]. Clin Chem, 2003, 49(1): 1-6.
  • 2Coppus SF, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM, et al. Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative[J]. Fertil Steril, 2006, 86(5): 1321-1329.
  • 3Smidt N, Rutjes AW, van der Windt DA, et al. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved?[J]. Neurology, 2006, 67 (5): 792-797.
  • 4Korevaar DA~ vaa Enst WA~ Spijker R, et al. Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis ofinvestigations on adherence to STARD[J]. Evid Based Med, 2014, 19(2): 47-54.
  • 5Hu ZD, Wei TT, Yang M, et al. Diagnostic value of osteopontin in ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review[J]. PLoS One, 2015,10(5): e0126444.
  • 6Zhang J, Hu ZD, Song J, et al. Diagnostic value ofpresepsin for sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2015, 94(47): e2158.
  • 7Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2011, 155(8): 529-536.
  • 8Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, et al. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnosticaccuracy included in systematic reviews [J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2003, 3: 25.
  • 9Whiting P, Rutjes AW, ReitsmaJB, et al. Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2004, 140(3): 189-202.
  • 10Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies [J]. Clin Chem, 2015, 61 (12): 1446-1452.

共引文献1

同被引文献16

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部