期刊文献+

对审稿制度中同行评议的再思考 被引量:7

Reconsideration of Peer Evaluation in Reviewing System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从近年大规模撤稿和不合理弃稿事件,对科技期刊三审制中的同行评议所存在的问题进行了分析,提出了改进建议;对比了国内外处理学术造假事件的情况,得出:没有完美无缺的审稿制度,加大造假者的处罚力度,才是杜绝此类学术造假的关键。 From the large-scale withdrawals and unreasonable abandonment cases in recent years,this paper analyzes the existing problems of peer review evaluation in the reviewing system and puts forward suggestions for improvement.Comparing the situation of dealing with academic counterfeiting at home and abroad,we come to the conclusion that there is no perfect reviewing system and the punishment of frauds is the key to stop such academic fraud.
作者 王谦 WANG Qian(Journal of Communication University of China,Beijing 100024,China)
出处 《中国传媒大学学报(自然科学版)》 2017年第5期57-59,56,共4页 Journal of Communication University of China:Science and Technology
关键词 同行评议 学术造假 处罚 peer evaluation academic fraud punishment
  • 相关文献

同被引文献71

引证文献7

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部