麦默通微创旋切术与传统手术治疗乳腺肿块的疗效

Effect of Mammotome Minimally Invasive Surgery and Traditional Surgery in the Treatment of Breast Tumor

目的比较乳腺肿块应用麦默通微创旋切术和传统手术治疗的效果。方法方便选取该院2016年12月—2017年10月收治的90例乳腺肿块患者,研究组实施麦默通微创旋切术治疗,对照组采用传统开放手术治疗,比较两组治疗效果。结果两组术中出血量、手术时间、术后愈合时间及住院时间比较,差异有统计学意义(t=16.408,10.638,10.126,12.193,P<0.05)。研究组术后瘢痕大小为(5.8±0.9)mm,VAS评分为(2.1±0.6)分,与对照组的(23.7±1.8)mm和(4.0±1.1)分比较,差异有统计学意义(t=61.428,10.435,P<0.05)。研究组与对照组并发症发生率分别为4.0%和22.5%,组间差异有统计学意义(χ~2=9.456,P<0.05)。结论麦默通微创旋切术治疗乳腺肿块优势明显,可加强应用。

Objective This paper tries to compare the breast mass application of mammotome minimally invasive surgery and traditional surgery treatment effect.Methods A total of 90 patients in this hospital from December 2016 to October 2017 were convenient selected patients with breast masses,the research group received mammotome minimally invasive surgery treatment,the control group using the traditional open surgery treatment,treatment effects were compared between the two groups.Results There were significant differences in intraoperative blood loss,operation time,postoperative healing time and hospital stay between the two groups(t=16.408,10.638,10.126,12.193,P<0.05).The scar size of the study group was(5.8±0.9)mm,and the VAS score was(2.1±0.6)points,which was significantly different from that of the control group(23.7±1.8)mm and(4.0±1.1)points(t=61.428,10.435,P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the study group and the control group were 4.0%and 22.5%,respectively,with significant difference between groups(χ2=9.456,P<0.05).Conclusion Mammotome minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of breast masses have obvious advantages can strengthen the application.