摘要
在认罪认罚案件证明标准不降低的情况下,一律适用严格证明无法解决案多人少的矛盾,在一定程度上阻碍了提升诉讼效率的改革目的。基于此,对于被追诉人认罪认罚的案件,在严格证明的基础上引入自由证明和适当证明,在不同程序中适用不同程度的证明方法。
In cases where the standard of proof in guilty plea cases is not reduced, the application of strict proof cannot solve the problem of many cases with fewer handlers, which has,to a certain extent, hindered the reform purpose of improving the efficiency of litigation. On the basis of strict proof, in the cases of guilty plea by the accused ,we can introduce free proof and proper proof, and apply different degrees of proof method in different procedures.
作者
于泓
张鹏
姜康康
YU Hong;ZHANG Peng;JIANG Kang-kang(Beijing People’s Procuratorate,Beijing 100040;Baodi District People’s Procuratorate,Tianjin 301800,China)
出处
《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》
2018年第2期81-84,共4页
Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators
关键词
认罪认罚
证明方法
走私犯罪
guilty plea
proof method
smuggling crimes